The Cable Companies
Wall Street
The Public Interest Groups
Call or Fax Your Representative!
Congressional representatives are often more responsive to phone calls. If you see you representative in this list of Commerce Committee members - please take a moment and give their office a call!
| US House Representatives on the Committee on Energy and Commerce |
109th Congress
|
Reps Sorted by State - Jump to a State: | AR | CA | CO | FL | GA | ID | IN | IL | KY | MA | MD | MI | MO | MS | NC | NE | NH | NJ | NM | NY | OH | OR | PA | TN | TX | VA | WI | WA | WY | |
| Representative names link to additional information at congress.org |
'06 Cable/Telco Donations to individual Representative are for 2006 cycle.
For donation breakdowns, additional info and 2005 donations, see this page |
|
Representatives
|
State
|
Office Address
|
Phone
|
Fax
|
'06 Cable/Telco$ |
Mike Ross (D-AR-4th), aide - Monique Frazier |
|
314 Cannon HOB, Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3772 |
202-225-1314 |
$19,250
|
John B. Shadegg (R-AZ-3rd) aide - Eric Schlecht |
|
306 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3361 |
202-225-3462 |
$24,000
|
George Radanovich (R-CA-19th) aide - Hollyn Schuemann |
|
438 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4540 |
202-225-3402 |
$29,100
|
Mary Bono (R-CA-45th) aide - Chris Lynch |
CA
|
405 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5330 |
202-225-2961 |
$31,500
|
Lois Capps (D-CA-23rd) aide - Randolph Harrison |
CA
|
1707 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3601 |
202-225-5632 |
$12,000
|
Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA-14th) aide - Jason Mahler |
CA
|
205 Cannon HOB Washington DC 20515 |
202-225-8104 |
202-225-8890 |
$24,500
|
Hilda L. Solis (D-CA-32nd) aide - Don Lyster |
CA
|
1725 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5464 |
202-225-5467 |
$19,000
|
Henry A. Waxman (D-CA-30th) aide - Pat Delgado |
CA
|
2204 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3976 |
202-225-4099 |
$14,000
|
Diana DeGette (D-CO-1st) aide - Shannon Good |
|
1527 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4431 |
202-225-5657 |
$17,000
|
Michael Bilirakis (R-FL-9th) Vice Chairman aide - Rebecca Hyder |
|
2408 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5755 |
202-225-4085 |
$1,000
|
Jim Davis (D-FL-11th) aide - J.J. Piskadlo |
FL
|
409 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3376 |
202-225-5652 |
$0
|
Cliff Stearns (R-FL-6th) aide - David Hickey |
FL
|
2370 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5744 |
202-225-3973 |
$28,000
|
Nathan Deal (R-GA-10th) aide - Merritt Myers |
|
2133 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5211 |
202-225-8272 |
$24,500
|
Charlie Norwood (R-GA-9th) aide - Greg Facchiano |
GA
|
2452 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4101 |
202-226-0776 |
$26,000
|
C.L. “Butch” Otter (R-ID-1st) aide - Jani Revier |
|
1711 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6611 |
202-225-3029 |
$5,000
|
Steve Buyer (R-IN-4th) aide - Laura Zuckerman |
|
2230 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5037 |
202-225-2267 |
$30,750
|
Bobby L. Rush (D-IL-1st) aide - Yardly Pollas-Kimble |
|
2416 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4372 |
202-226-0333 |
$21,000
|
Jan Schakowsky (D-IL-9th) aide - Diane Beetle |
IL
|
1027 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2111 |
202-226-6890 |
$14,000
|
John Shimkus (R-IL-19th) aide - Ryan Tracy |
IL
|
513 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5271 |
202-225-5880 |
$29,500
|
Ed Whitfield (R-KY-1st) aide - Brent Dolen |
|
301 Connaon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3115 |
202-225-3547 |
$34,900
|
Edward J. Markey (D-MA-7th) aide - Colin Crowell |
|
2108 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2836 |
202-226-0092 |
$39,000
|
Albert R. Wynn (D-MD-4th) aide - Ben Branch |
|
434 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-8699 |
202-225-8714 |
$19,100
|
Tom Allen (D-ME-1st) aide - Todd Stein |
|
1127 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6116 |
202-225-5590 |
$11,500
|
John D. Dingell (D-MI-15th) Ranking Member aide - Josh Tzuker |
|
2328 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4071 |
202-226-0371 |
$30,000
|
Mike Rogers (R-MI-8th) aide - Mike Ward |
MI
|
133 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4872 |
202-225-5820 |
$39,500
|
Bart Stupak (D-MI-1st) aide - Sonya Wendell |
MI
|
2352 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4735 |
202-225-4744 |
$18,399
|
Fred Upton (R-MI-6th) aide - Will Nordwind |
MI
|
2183 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3761 |
202-225-4986 |
$61,250
|
Roy Blunt (R-MO-7th) aide - Mark Anderson |
|
217 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6536 |
202-225-5604 |
$66,500
|
Charles Pickering (R-MS-3rd) Vice Chairman aide - Brian Perry |
|
229 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5031 |
202-225-5797 |
$65,000
|
Sue Myrick (R-NC-9th) aide - Matt Priest |
|
230 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-1976 |
202-225-3389 |
$26,000
|
Lee Terry (R-NE-2nd) aide - Robert Stien |
|
1524 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4155 |
202-226-5452 |
$25,000
|
Charles F. Bass (R-NH-2nd) aide - Tad Furtado |
|
2421 Rayburn HOB Washington DC 20515 |
202-225-5206 |
202-225-2946 |
$22,500
|
Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ-6th) aide - Tim Delmonico |
|
420 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4671 |
202-225-9665 |
$28,500
|
Mike Ferguson (R-NJ-7th) aide - Greg Orlando |
NJ
|
214 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5361 |
202-225-9460 |
$62,200
|
Heather Wilson (R-NM-1st) aide - Bryce Dustman |
|
318 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6316 |
202-225-4975 |
$27,000
|
Eliot L. Engel (D-NY-17th) aide - Pete Leon |
|
2161 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2464 |
202-225-5513 |
$45,999
|
Edolphus Towns (D-NY-10th) aide - Ruth Morrison |
NY
|
2232 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5936 |
202-225-1018 |
$22,000
|
Vito Fossella (R-NY-13th) aide - Brendan Williams |
NY
|
1239 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3371 |
202-226-1272 |
$28,500
|
John Sullivan (R-OK-1st) aide - Wendy Der |
|
114 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2211 |
202-225-9187 |
$26,250
|
Sherrod Brown (D-OH-13th) aide - Diana Baron |
|
2332 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3401 |
202-225-2266 |
$12,000
|
Ted Strickland (D-OH-6th) aide - Michelle Dallafior |
OH
|
336 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-5705 |
202-225-5907 |
$0
|
Paul E. Gillmor (R-OH-5th) aide - Ryan Walker |
OH
|
1203 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6405 |
202-225-1985 |
$11,000
|
Greg Walden (R-OR-2nd) aide - Brian Hard |
|
1210 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6730 |
202-225-5774 |
$20,500
|
Tim Murphy (R-PA-18th) aide - Michael Mason |
|
322 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2301 |
202-225-1844 |
$21,000
|
Joseph R. Pitts (R-PA-16th) aide - Gabe |
PA
|
221 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2411 |
202-225-2013 |
$14,733
|
Mike Doyle (D-PA-14th) aide - Mike Mullen |
PA
|
401 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2135 |
202-225-3084 |
$18,000
|
Bart Gordon (D-TN-6th) aide - Dana Lichtenberg |
|
2304 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-4231 |
202-225-6887 |
$17,000
|
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN-7th) aide - Mike Platt |
TN
|
509 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2811 |
202-225-3004 |
$36,000
|
Joe Barton (R-TX-6th) Chairman aide - Theresa Lavery |
|
2109 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2002 |
202 225-3052 |
$98,200
|
Michael Burgess (R-TX-26th) aide - Barry Brown |
TX
|
1721 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-7772 |
202-225-2919 |
$22,250
|
Charles A. Gonzalez (D-TX-20th) aide - Tony Zaffirini |
TX
|
327 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3236 |
202-225-1915 |
$16,500
|
Gene Green (D-TX-29th) aide - Andrew Wallace |
TX
|
2335 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-1688 |
202-225-9903 |
$12,000
|
Ralph M. Hall (R-TX-4th) aide - Elizabeth Stack |
TX
|
2405 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6673 |
202-225-3332 |
$15,000
|
Rick Boucher (D-VA-9th) aide - Amy Levine |
|
2187 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-3861 |
202-225-0442 |
$40,000
|
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI-2nd) aide - David Stacy |
|
1022 Longworth HOB Washington DC 20515 |
202-225-2906 |
202 225-6942 |
$20,673
|
Jay Inslee (D-WA-1st) aide - Brian Peters |
|
403 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-6311 |
202-226-1606 |
$15,500
|
Barbara Cubin (R-WY-AL) aide - Patrick Thompson |
|
1114 Longwoth HOB Washington, DC 20515 |
202-225-2311 |
202-225-3057 |
$21,000
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Cities to the Telcos and Washington - Can You Hear Us Now?
There's been much activity of late at the municipal level in response to the House and Senate Bills, a summary below. Remember that AT&T and Verizon started the whole state and national franchising push because they claimed that negotiating with local municipalities (as cable companies do) was just too burdensome and slow (for their desired business plan). The cities have a different story to tell . . .
Michigan
In response to the current AT&T push in Michigan for a state-wide franchise, the Michigan Municipal League and Michigan Township Association released a press release today asserting that AT&T has failed to respond to more than 600 invitations and resolutions throughout state asking AT&T to sign local franchise agreements and compete for cable TV customers. It is a very pointed question; "Michigan communities to AT&T: Can you hear us now?" The press release goes on to say “We call on AT&T to explain to Michigan consumers why AT&T is withholding local competition by not signing local franchise agreements and why they don’t want to serve ‘low-value’ residents as they told their Wall Street investors.”
Texas
How badly do the Telcos want state and national franchises? In Texas alone it is estimated that AT&T / SBC spent seven million dollars (see article). They had 112 lobbyists on the payroll, almost one for every state legislator. The end result, the franchise passed.
New York City
Meanwhile in New York City, the City Council is poised to pass a resolution on May 10th that sends a strong message to Congress to say NO to the House and Senate Bills and to say YES to maintaining local control and local franchises. NYC is served by five vibrant public access facilities in each borough, four municipal channels and one educational channel, all of which will face an uncertain future under the House and Senate legislation. The New York City Independent Budget Office estimates that the loss of local franchising could cost the city as much as 75 million if voided. "The city could also lose funding for its public access television production networks as well as five of the nine channels it has for government and educational broadcasting." The city takes this seriously, Borough President Scott Stringer lays it out simply; "This is a clear case of the federal government interceding into a local system which operates well and best serves the needs of local residents in order to demand a one-size fits all approach which will benefit corporations not residents". In the seventies, during a budget crisis, the word from Washington to NYC was 'Drop Dead', on May 10th that message is being sent back, albeit more politely.
Note: on May 10th The New York City Council unanimously approved the resolution (read)urging Congress to reject proposed legislation that would restrict or eliminate local video franchising at the community level, the vote was 50-0.More news here.
National Organizations Respond
Local governments oppose the proposed Communication, Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act (COPE) and say national franchising would limit video competition to well-to-do neighborhoods, threaten local budgets, and undermine their ability to protect their residents and manage public rights of way.
An unprecedented coalition of organizations representing U.S. cities have issued the following joint statements. The coalition includes; National League of Cities (NLC), US Conference on Mayors, National Association of Counties, National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisers (NATOA), Government Finance Officers Association, National Conference of Black Mayors and the International Municipal Lawyers Association.
Documents:
Coalition Letter to Congress (PDF)
Truth Versus Telephone Industry Spin (PDF)
Local Governments Urge Congress to Vote 'No'
04/28/06 SOURCE
The telecom reform bill, as it now stands, will, in effect, silence the voices of consumers and local governments. If enacted, consumers will be at the mercy of telecommunication giants and the federal government when faced with concerns about their television and advanced Internet services. This measure leaves the door wide open for service providers to pick and choose which neighborhoods get premium services and which get no service at all. Local governments continue to urge Congress to protect our taxpaying consumers and maintain local government oversight of service providers. We urge them to vote "no" on the COPE bill when it comes before the House. Specific concerns are:
• The bill strips local governments of their authority to franchise the use of public rights-of-way for video/cable services and gives that authority to the federal government. The FCC has never had the authority to regulate local public rights-of-way and has no expertise concerning local streets, sidewalks, public safety or traffic patterns.
• The bill gives the federal government the authority to oversee and second-guess all local rights-of-way management practices and all customer service issues.
• The bill allows broadband-video service providers to pick and choose which neighborhoods they want to serve while bypassing all others completely. The bill would even allow broadband/video providers to avoid maintaining or upgrading facilities in poorer neighborhoods while affluent neighborhoods receive cutting-edge services and lower prices.
Local governments want their consumers to have meaningful competitive services – not higher rates and no consumer recourse.
Sent by the National League of Cities, the US Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Counties, National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors, Government Finance Officers Association, the Intermunicipal Lawyers Association, TeleCommUnity, and the National Conference of Black Mayors.
Contacts: Sherry Conway Appel, NLC, 202-626-3003; Elena Temple, USCM, 202-861-6719; Jim Philipps, NACO, 202-942-4220; Libby Beaty, NATOA, 703-519-803
Democratic Voting Scorecard for COPE
Don't let your elected representatives get away with this! Send a letter to your Representatives and ask them WHY did you vote FOR COPE? This letter will only be sent to representatives that voted for COPE.
| DEMOCRATS VOTING FOR COPE - HR 5252 |
|
| State |
District |
Name |
|
|
| AL |
5 |
Robert Cramer, Jr. |
|
| AL |
7 |
Artur Davis |
|
|
| AR |
1 |
Marion Berry |
|
|
| AR |
4 |
Michael A. Ross |
|
| AZ |
4 |
Ed Pastor |
|
|
| CA |
18 |
Dennis Cardoza |
|
| CA |
20 |
Jim Costa |
|
|
| CA |
36 |
Jane Harman |
|
| CA |
43 |
Joe Baca |
|
|
| CA |
47 |
Loretta Sanchez |
|
| CO |
2 |
Mark Udall |
|
|
| CO |
3 |
John Salazar |
|
| CT |
1 |
John Larson |
|
|
| CT |
3 |
Rosa L. DeLauro |
|
| FL |
2 |
Allen Boyd |
|
|
| FL |
3 |
Corrine Brown |
|
| FL |
17 |
Kendrick B. Meek |
|
| FL |
19 |
Robert Wexler |
|
| FL |
20 |
Debbie Wasserman Schultz |
| FL |
23 |
Alcee L. Hastings |
|
| GA |
2 |
Sanford Bishop, Jr. |
|
| GA |
3 |
Jim Marshall |
|
|
| GA |
12 |
John Barrow |
|
|
| GA |
13 |
David Scott |
|
|
| IA |
3 |
Leonard L. Boswell |
|
| IL |
1 |
Bobby L. Rush |
|
| IL |
2 |
Jesse Jackson, Jr. |
|
| IL |
3 |
Dan Lipinski |
|
|
| IL |
4 |
Luis V. Gutierrez |
|
| IL |
7 |
Danny Davis |
|
|
| IL |
8 |
Melissa Bean |
|
| IN |
1 |
Peter J. Visclosky |
|
| IN |
7 |
Julia Carson |
|
|
| KS |
3 |
Dennis Moore |
|
| KY |
6 |
Ben Chandler |
|
| LA |
2 |
William J. Jefferson |
|
| LA |
3 |
Charlie Melancon |
|
| MA |
2 |
Richard E. Neal |
|
| MA |
9 |
Stephen Lynch |
|
| MD |
2 |
C. A. Ruppersberger |
|
| MD |
3 |
Benjamin L. Cardin |
|
| MD |
4 |
Albert Wynn |
|
|
| MD |
5 |
Steny H. Hoyer |
|
| MD |
7 |
Elijah E. Cummings |
|
| MD |
8 |
Christopher Van Hollen, Jr. |
| ME |
2 |
Mike Michaud |
|
| MI |
1 |
Bart Stupak |
|
|
| MO |
1 |
William Lacy Clay, Jr. |
|
| MO |
3 |
Russ Carnahan |
|
| MO |
4 |
Ike Skelton |
|
|
| MS |
2 |
Bennie G. Thompson |
|
| NC |
1 |
G. K. Butterfield, Jr. |
|
| NC |
2 |
Bobby Etheridge |
|
| NC |
7 |
Mike McIntyre |
|
| NC |
12 |
Melvin L. Watt |
|
| ND |
At-L |
Earl Pomeroy |
|
| NJ |
1 |
Robert E. Andrews |
|
| NJ |
6 |
Frank Pallone, Jr. |
|
| NJ |
8 |
Bill Pascrell, Jr. |
|
| NJ |
9 |
Steven R. Rothman |
|
| NM |
3 |
Thomas Udall |
|
| NV |
1 |
Shelley Berkley |
|
| NY |
1 |
Timothy H. Bishop |
|
| NY |
2 |
Steve J. Israel |
|
| NY |
4 |
Carolyn McCarthy |
|
| NY |
5 |
Gary L. Ackerman |
|
| NY |
6 |
Gregory W. Meeks |
|
| NY |
7 |
Joseph Crowley |
|
| NY |
10 |
Edolphus Towns |
|
| NY |
11 |
Major R. Owens |
|
| NY |
15 |
Charles B. Rangel |
|
| NY |
17 |
Eliot L. Engel |
|
| NY |
27 |
Brian M. Higgins |
|
| OH |
6 |
Ted Strickland |
|
| OH |
11 |
Stephanie T. Jones |
|
| OK |
2 |
Dan Boren |
|
|
| OR |
5 |
Darlene Hooley |
|
| PA |
13 |
Allyson Schwartz |
|
| RI |
1 |
Patrick J. Kennedy |
|
| RI |
2 |
James R. Langevin |
|
| SC |
5 |
John M. Spratt, Jr. |
|
| SC |
6 |
James E. Clyburn |
|
| SD |
At-L |
Stephanie Herseth |
|
| TN |
4 |
Lincoln Davis |
|
| TN |
5 |
Jim Cooper |
|
|
| TN |
6 |
Bart Gordon |
|
|
| TN |
8 |
John S. Tanner |
|
| TN |
9 |
Harold E. Ford, Jr. |
|
| TX |
9 |
Al Green |
|
|
| TX |
15 |
Ruben Hinojosa |
|
| TX |
17 |
Chet Edwards |
|
| TX |
18 |
Sheila Jackson-Lee |
|
| TX |
20 |
Charles A. Gonzalez |
|
| TX |
27 |
Solomon P. Ortiz |
|
| TX |
28 |
Henry Cuellar |
|
| TX |
29 |
Gene Green |
|
|
| TX |
30 |
Eddie Bernice Johnson |
|
| UT |
2 |
James D. Matheson |
|
| VA |
8 |
James P. Moran |
|
| VA |
9 |
Rick Boucher |
|
| WA |
1 |
Jay Inslee |
|
|
| WA |
6 |
Norman D. Dicks |
|
| WA |
9 |
Adam Smith |
|
|
| WI |
3 |
Ron Kind |
|
|
| WV |
1 |
Alan B. Mollohan |
|
| WV |
3 |
Nick Joe Rahall, II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DEMOCRATS NOT VOTING |
|
|
| FL |
11 |
Jim Davis |
|
|
| IL |
17 |
Lane Evans |
|
|
| TX |
16 |
Silvestre Reyes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DEMOCRATS VOTING AGAINST COPE - HR 5252 |
|
| AR |
2 |
Vic Snyder |
|
|
| AZ |
7 |
Raul Grijalva |
|
|
| CA |
1 |
Mike Thompson |
|
| CA |
5 |
Doris Matsui |
|
|
| CA |
6 |
Lynn C. Woolsey |
|
| CA |
7 |
George Miller |
|
| CA |
8 |
Nancy Pelosi |
|
|
| CA |
9 |
Barbara Lee |
|
|
| CA |
10 |
Ellen O. Tauscher |
|
| CA |
12 |
Tom Lantos |
|
|
| CA |
13 |
Fortney (Pete) Stark |
|
| CA |
14 |
Anna G. Eshoo |
|
| CA |
15 |
Mike Honda |
|
|
| CA |
16 |
Zoe Lofgren |
|
|
| CA |
17 |
Sam Farr |
|
|
| CA |
23 |
Lois Capps |
|
|
| CA |
27 |
Brad Sherman |
|
| CA |
28 |
Howard L. Berman |
|
| CA |
29 |
Adam Schiff |
|
|
| CA |
30 |
Henry A. Waxman |
|
| CA |
31 |
Xavier Becerra |
|
| CA |
32 |
Hilda A. Solis |
|
| CA |
33 |
Diane E. Watson |
|
| CA |
34 |
Lucille Roybal-Allard |
|
| CA |
35 |
Maxine Waters |
|
| CA |
37 |
Juanita Millender-McDonald |
| CA |
38 |
Grace Napolitano |
|
| CA |
39 |
Linda T. Sanchez |
|
| CA |
51 |
Bob Filner |
|
|
| CA |
53 |
Susan A. Davis |
|
| CO |
1 |
Diana DeGette |
|
| GA |
4 |
Cynthia McKinney |
|
| GA |
5 |
John Lewis |
|
|
| HI |
1 |
Neil Abercrombie |
|
| HI |
2 |
Ed Case |
|
|
| IL |
5 |
Rahm Emanuel |
|
| IL |
9 |
Janice Schakowsky |
|
| IL |
12 |
Jerry F. Costello |
|
| MA |
1 |
John W. Olver |
|
| MA |
3 |
James McGovern |
|
| MA |
4 |
Barney Frank |
|
| MA |
5 |
Martin T. Meehan |
|
| MA |
6 |
John Tierney |
|
| MA |
7 |
Edward J. Markey |
|
| MA |
8 |
Michael Capuano |
|
| MA |
10 |
William D. Delahunt |
|
| ME |
1 |
Thomas H. Allen |
|
| MI |
5 |
Dale E. Kildee |
|
| MI |
12 |
Sander M. Levin |
|
| MI |
13 |
Carolyn Kilpatrick |
|
| MI |
14 |
John Conyers, Jr. |
|
| MI |
15 |
John D. Dingell |
|
| MN |
4 |
Betty McCollum |
|
| MN |
5 |
Martin Olav Sabo |
|
| MN |
7 |
Collin C. Peterson |
|
| MN |
8 |
James L. Oberstar |
|
| MO |
5 |
Emanuel Cleaver, II |
|
| MS |
4 |
Gene Taylor |
|
|
| NC |
4 |
David E. Price |
|
| NC |
13 |
Brad Miller |
|
|
| NJ |
10 |
Donald M. Payne |
|
| NJ |
12 |
Rush Holt |
|
|
| NY |
8 |
Jerrold Nadler |
|
| NY |
9 |
Anthony Weiner |
|
| NY |
12 |
Nydia M. Velazquez |
|
| NY |
14 |
Carolyn B. Maloney |
|
| NY |
16 |
Jose E. Serrano |
|
| NY |
18 |
Nita M. Lowey |
|
| NY |
21 |
Michael R. McNulty |
|
| NY |
22 |
Maurice D. Hinchey |
|
| NY |
28 |
Louise Slaughter |
|
| OH |
9 |
Marcy Kaptur |
|
| OH |
10 |
Dennis J. Kucinich |
|
| OH |
13 |
Sherrod Brown |
|
| OH |
17 |
Tim Ryan |
|
|
| OR |
1 |
David Wu |
|
|
| OR |
3 |
Earl Blumenauer |
|
| OR |
4 |
Peter A. DeFazio |
|
| PA |
1 |
Robert A. Brady |
|
| PA |
2 |
Chaka Fattah |
|
| PA |
11 |
Paul E. Kanjorski |
|
| PA |
12 |
John P. Murtha |
|
| PA |
14 |
Michael F. Doyle |
|
| PA |
17 |
Tim Holden |
|
|
| TX |
25 |
Lloyd Doggett |
|
| VA |
3 |
Robert C. Scott |
|
| VT |
At-L |
Bernard Sanders |
|
| WA |
2 |
Richard R. Larsen |
|
| WA |
3 |
Brian Baird |
|
|
| WA |
7 |
Jim McDermott |
|
| WI |
2 |
Tammy Baldwin |
|
| WI |
4 |
Gwen Moore |
|
|
| WI |
7 |
David R. Obey |
|
Thanks to Rob McCausland for creating this list
FCC Video Franchising Alert - Take Action
from: Alliance for Community Media
The Alliance for Community Media has issued this call for action in regards to the upcoming FCC ruling to be issued on Video Franchising. Please take a moment to make calls and send letters before December 13th!
Action Alert: FCC MB 05-311, Demand Fair Play for PEG Community, Our Towns And Cities!
The Alliance is calling on all supporters of Community Media to call and write the FCC no later than Wednesday, December 13!
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is preparing to issue a rule-making on video-franchising. This rule-making is the bureaucratic version of the national telecom laws we helped to defeat this past year. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. We cannot allow the FCC do to us what some members of Congress were unable to do.
Part of what is being proposed:
• All PEG, I-Net and other in-kind services would be counted against 5% franchise fees. 5% would be an absolute cap.
• Municipalities would have to approve new franchises for telephone companies within 90 days or allow them to operate without franchises.
• There would be no build-out requirements allowed whatsoever.
We expect a vote by December 20th.
After Wednesday December 13th, public comment and meetings will be formally cut-off. We have to get our contacts and comments in before then so the weight of our community will be felt in the formal record.
The FCC process is different and more formal than is the Congressional. The meetings are required to be made public. There are five commissioners and they all have to respond to YOU. You may contact them each, whether you represent an organization or not. They have all had to meet with industry already. They need to hear from us.
Attached below are talking points and tools for making this contact easy. The Public Policy Work Group has tried to make this FCC contact an easy step-by-step process for everyone. It is a learning process for us all. Please download the Action Alert and join in the action today.
We are always successful when we stand together in these efforts. We know what is at stake. We understand how these little technical questions fit into the big picture of who we are as a people and the world those who follow will inherit from us.
We'd like to generate about 500 contacts in the 5 days. The whole set of actions will take 30-45 minutes, max. It is not too much of an investment. Set aside a little time and spread the word far and wide.
The ACM is calling for supporters to do four actionable items. Directions are in this document and at the Alliance site. We've taken the liberty of adding the steps here as well:
Four Steps to be Heard Introduction
Step One Call the FCC
Step Two File an FCC Comment
Step Three Send your FCC Comment to Congress
Step Four Fax Congress
Be sure to check the Alliance site for updates.
FCC Action Alert - Four Steps to Being Heard
Four Steps to Being Heard
Below are the actions which we would ask that you take by 5 PM EST Wednesday, December 13th. We hope that you will take all of the actions, but understand fully how busy you may be. Therefore, we have listed the actions in order of importance and effect.
Step 1
Call each of the FCC commission offices using the attached script as-is or modified as needed.
Step 2
File your official record of the call(s). This is called “Notice of ex parte meeting” and goes into the official record. Web address is listed in instructions below.
Step 3
With one click, you can email your ex parte letter and comments to the FCC and Congress using our auto-mailer linked to the Alliance home page www.alliancecm.org.
Step 4
Fax a copy of the same ex-parte letter to your three Congress members.
[Note: The multiple exposures to our message are intentional.]
FCC Action Alert - Step One
Step 1: Call the FCC
[Estimated Time: 2 minutes per call]
We want large numbers of short calls. You are not asked to be experts, merely to weigh in on the matter of video franchising and PEG. This will likely take less than two minutes. When you call, you will likely be referred to voicemail. Whether you get voicemail or are graced with a real conversation, the script is the basically the same. This is a formal process, so it is okay to read from a script. Feel free to make it fit your needs. It’s your call. They have to listen.
Hello, my name is [Name]. I am [Title/Relationship] for [Organization or Community] located in [City and State].
I am calling about MB 05-311 on video franchising. The following are our concerns:
We unite with Alliance for Community Media members in calling for competition without destruction of local, community controlled media.
1) The proposed rule eliminates incentive for providers to negotiate in good faith. If the city and the provider do not come to agreement in 90 days, the new provider can proceed without agreement. They can then make billions of dollars in our public land without considering local needs.
2) The proposed rule lacks a remedy for geographic discrimination. Public, Education and Government Access, or PEG, are tools to engage our local communities in democracy. Democratic participation should be for all, not based on a company business rule.
3) The proposed rule reduces the support for PEG, institutional networks and other in-kind services from that allowed by current Federal law. It is in direct contradiction to language written by the telephone companies and already passed in key states. This reduction would eliminate a valued community resource with no demonstrated effect on either price or competition.
4) The changes being proposed are dramatic and over-step the FCC’s authority. We believe that such changes to the law should be made by Congress, not the FCC. These changes will slow competition by confusing the legal framework. Changes to the law should be decided by law-makers, not the FCC.
I can be reached at [Phone or Email]. Thank you for your consideration.
FCC Phone Numbers Below:
| Commissioner |
Media Aide |
Phone Number |
| MacDowell |
Christina Pauze (paw-ZAY) |
202-418-2200 |
| Tate |
Chris Robbins |
202-418-2500 |
| Chairman Martin |
Heather Dixon |
202-418-1000 |
| Adelstein |
Rudy Brioche (bree-o-SHAY) |
202-418-2300 |
| Copps |
Bruce Gottlieb |
202-418-2000 |
FCC Action Alert - Step Two
Step 2: Filing an Official Call Record (Ex Parte)
[Estimated Time: 5 Minutes]
1) Cut and paste the letter below into a blank Word, WordPerfect or text document. It may be completely blank or may be electronic stationery. Save the file.
2) Fill in and edit the letter as appropriate.
3) Go to the FCC filing page: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
Use Explorer or Firefox - some problems have been reported with Safari.
4) Fill out the cover sheet information, including:
a. #1: fill in “05-311”
b. #11: do check box
c. #12: pull menu down to “notice”
5) In the green section, type “ex parte notice” for file description.
6) In the green section, use “Browse” button to attach your letter file.
7) In the green section, use pull down menu to identify letter format.
8) Hit Send. [Note: Correspondence is appropriately addressed to “Secretary” Dortch.]
9) Done!
Sample letter below (fill in areas in italic):
[Date]
Ex Parte
Ms. Marilyn Dortch, Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554
Re: Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, MB Docket No. 05-311
Dear Ms. Dortch,
This notice is to record our ex parte meeting(s) with [FCC Commissioners or staff names]. We stated our concerns [directly via phone or via voicemail] on [date(s)]. Our comments are summarized as follows:
We unite with Alliance for Community Media members in calling for competition without destruction of local, community controlled media.
1) The proposed rule eliminates incentive for providers to negotiate in good faith. If the city and the provider do not come to agreement within 90 days, the provider can proceed without an agreement. They can then make billions of dollars using our public land without considering local needs. This framework would be unreasonable.
2) The proposed rule lacks a remedy for geographic discrimination. Public, Education and Government Access, or PEG, are tools to engage our local communities in democracy. Democratic participation should be for all, not based on a company business rule. The public-right-of-way is owned by all in our community, not just those in an area lucky enough to be served. We believe that inevitable market imbalances must be anticipated by the FCC, as they were by Congress, and that any rule-making must provide these three elements:
A) A standard for identifying imbalances in service.
B) A party responsible for identifying the imbalance—logically, the municipality.
C) A means for prevention or remedy of the imbalance.
3) The proposed rule reduces the support for PEG or other community media services from what is allowed by current Federal law. We believe this is an arbitrary reduction which will hurt our communities. It is in direct contradiction to language authored by telephone companies and already passed in key states such as California and Texas. This reduction would eliminate a valued community resource with no demonstrated effect on either subscriber price or level of competition.
4) The changes being proposed to the law are dramatic. We believe that such changes to the law should be made by Congress, not the FCC. These changes will slow competition by confusing the legal framework. Such changes should be decided by law-makers, not the courts. The FCC should not usurp Congressional authority.
We look forward to working with the FCC to establish a process which supports both competition and community fairness. Please contact us if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Title and/or Affiliation]
[Street Address]
[City, State Zip]
[Phone]
[Email Address]
CC: Christina Pauze
Chris Robbins
Heather Dixon
Rudy Brioche
Bruce Gottlieb
My Congressional Delegation
FCC Action Alert - Step Three
Step 3: Email copies to your Congressional delegation.
[Estimated time: 2 Minutes]
With one click, you should email your ex-parte letter or other comments to the FCC and Congress using our auto mailer at:
http://www.democracyinaction.org.
This direct link is also posted on the Alliance home page.
All you have to do is cut and paste your letter from Step 2 above into our easy auto-mailer. It will go automatically to your Senators and Representative.
FCC Action Alert - Step Four
Step 4: Fax a copy of the same letter to your Congress delegation.
[Estimated time: 5 Minutes]
Fax a copy of the same ex-parte letter to your three Congress members. A physical document in the office is more powerful than email alone.
The current fax numbers will follow on separate email and will be posted on Alliance website, thereafter. We will issue a similar document for the new, 110th Congress when available.
Or - get faxes numbers here by typing in your zip code: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
[Note: The multiple exposures to our message are intentional.]
In the States
Statewide Video Franchising Legislation
States to Watch:
CO | LA | ME | MA | MN | NY | PA | TN | UT | WA
With Federal legislation stalled in 2006 and unlikely for 2007, telephone companies have quickly turned to their Plan B: Statewide Video Franchising. In most cases, these video franchises over-ride local franchises and enable the telephone companies to begin to rollout their services to selected communities on a statewide basis.
Since 2006, a number of states have passed statewide video franchise legislation at the request of the telephone companies, other states are also considering legislation. Language varies between State Bills, but nearly all negatively impact on PEG, limiting the number of channels, cutting revenue streams and eliminating the possibility of future growth.
The telephone companies lobby heavily for these statewide franchises, spending upwards of 30 million on California alone. They promise 'competition' and 'lower prices' and pitch these as consumer bills, but in areas where telco video services have launched, prices largely remaind the same.
Below is a run down of current state video franchises. These bills move fast and are difficult to track, cross check our info here with Free Press to ensure you have the latest info.
Active State Legislation Bills likely to return in the next Legislative sessions.
Massachusetts Stalled Bill
Minnesota Stalled Bill
New York Stalled Bill
Tennessee Active Bill
Utah Stalled Bill
Washington Stalled Bill
Colorado Failed Bill
Louisiana Failed Bill
Maine Failed Bill
Pennsylvania Failed Bill
Passed State Legislation
Arizona
California
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Michigan
Missouri Passed 3/22/07
New Jersey
Nevada
North Carolina
Ohio
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Virginia
Wisconsin
Colorado Legislation
This page last updated 2/19/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
House Bill 1222, The Colorado Consumer Cable Act
Status:
Postponed indefinitely by an 8-4 vote Feb. 2007 of the state House transportation and energy committe.
Description:
N/A
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
More Information: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Florida Legislation
This page last updated 4/21/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
HB529 passed House and Senate and is awaiting Gov. Crist's signature. As passed, Build-out is banned and PEG support is reduced to 0%. The bill, in effect, ends and PEG channel support and legitimizes red-lining.
Bill Number(s):
S 1984 failed Read Bill
S 0900 failed Read Bill
HB 1199 failed Read Bill
HB 529 - Active Read Bill
HB 0855 - Stalled Read Bill
SB 1772 - Senate companion to HB 529 - Active Read Bill
HB 529 / SB 1772 Status:
01/23/07 HOUSE Filed
01/31/07 HOUSE Referred to Jobs & Entrepreneurship Council; Policy & Budget Council
02/15/07 HOUSE On Council agenda-- Jobs & Entrepreneurship Council,
02/22/07, 1:00 pm, Morris Hall
02/22/07 HOUSE CS by Jobs & Entrepreneurship Council; YEAS 11 NAYS 1
02/20/07 SENATE Filed
03/07/07 SENATE Introduced, referred to Communications and Public Utilities; Community Affairs; Finance and Tax -SJ 00116
03/11/07 HOUSE Now in Policy & Budget Council -HJ 00183
03/14/07 HOUSE On Council agenda-- Policy & Budget Council
03/16/07 HOUSE CS/CS by- Policy & Budget Council; YEAS 27 NAYS 3
03/19/07 HOUSE CS read 1st time on 03/19/07 -HJ 00222; CS filed; Placed on Calendar -HJ 00224
03/21/07 HOUSE Placed on Special Order Calendar; Read 2nd time -HJ 00237; Amendment(s) failed -HJ 00238
03/22/07 HOUSE Read 3rd time -HJ 00253; CS passed; YEAS 104 NAYS 8 -HJ 00253
03/28/07 SENATE In Messages
04/25/07 SENATE Received, referred to Communications and Public Utilities; Community Affairs; General Government Appropriations
04/26/07 SENATE Withdrawn from Communications and Public Utilities; Community Affairs; General Government Appropriations
04/27/07 SENATE Read 3rd time; Amendment(s) reconsidered,
04/27/07 HOUSE In returning messages
04/30/07 HOUSE Concurred -HJ 00859; CS passed as amended; YEAS 117 NAYS 2 -HJ 00865; Ordered engrossed, then enrolled -HJ 00865
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Georgia Legislation
This page last updated 4/27/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HB 227, Consumer Choice for Television Act Read Bill
HB is on the verge of passage, approved by House and sent to the governor. 4/27/07
HB 227 Status:
01/31/2007 House First Readers
02/01/2007 House Second Readers
02/22/2007 House Committee Favorably Reported
03/20/2007 House Third Readers
03/20/2007 House Passed/Adopted
03/27/2007 Senate Read and Referred
03/30/2007 Senate Committee Favorably Reported
04/11/2007 Senate Passes HB 227, 52-2
04/13/2007 House Agree Senate Amend or Sub
04/27/2007 House Sent to Governor
HB 227 passed in a House vote 166-2, see roll call vote.
Description:
Buildout
There are no buildout requirements.
Rights of Way
There is no specific language for rights of way.
PEG
• HB 227 outlines more stringent programming requirements and places limitations on a county being able to get an exclusive channel in a cable system’s lineup.
• 15 hours of nonduplicating original programming a month for each channel. Scrolling messages or bulletin board information would not count as non-duplicating programming. This will make it tougher for counties and cities to maintain these public access channels.
• Allows existing public access channels to continue through 2012, even if the channels don’t meet the bill’s programming requirements.
• Cable companies also will be able to combine programming from several counties and cities and decide when the programs will run.
• Franchise fee is currently 25 cents per subscriber and goes to the county to purchase equipment for programming production. The bill does provide that state cable franchise holders will pay local governments a 5 percent franchise fee on gross revenues for cable and video service. However,there are fears that fee revenue will fall because of the language of the bill. And there are further fears that after 2012, the funding will disappear.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Illinois Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HB1500 - Active Read Bill
Status:
2/21/2007 House Filed with the Clerk by Rep. James D. Brosnahan
2/22/2007 House First Reading
2/22/2007 House Referred to Rules Committee
2/23/2007 House Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Brandon W. Phelps
2/23/2007 House Added Co-Sponsor Rep. JoAnn D. Osmond
2/23/2007 House Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Thomas Holbrook
2/27/2007 House Assigned to Telecommunications Committee
3/23/2007 House Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
3/29/2007 House Assigned to Telecommunications Committee
3/29/2007 House Committee/3rd Reading Deadline Extended-Rule April 30, 2007
Description:
(from Multichannel News) Allows statewide authorization for newcomers, would allow overbuilders to drop local agreements in favor of statewide franchises. The bill would hold only incumbent cable operators to current franchises until their statutory end dates. As written, the exemption in HB1500 would appear to benefit the second operator to market, such as RCN in Chicago, and providers with even newer local agreements, such as Verizon Communications, which negotiated a local pact with North Chicago, Ill.
Organizations to Contact:
keepusconnected.org
More Information:
Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Iowa Legislation
This page last updated 4/18/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
SF 554 (formerly 368) - Active read Bill
SF 368 - now SF 554 Read Bill
SSB 1208 - now SF 368 Read Study Bill
HF 2647 - stalled Read Bill
SF 554 (formerly 368) Status
Mar. 06 07 Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 577.
Mar. 06 07 Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 584.
Mar. 13 07 Referred to Ways & Means. S.J. 711.
Mar. 14 07 Subcommittee, Stewart, Hogg, and Putney. S.J. 768.
March 20, 2007 Immediate message. S.J. 836.
March 21, 2007 Message from Senate. H.J. 957.
March 21, 2007 Read first time, referred to Commerce. H.J. 967.
March 22, 2007 Subcommittee, Wise, Hoffman, Jacobs, Kelley, Petersen, Quirk, and Struyk. H.J. 1001.
April 5, 2007 Committee report, recommending amendment and passage. H.J. 1268.
April 5, 2007 Committee amendment H-1598 filed. H.J. 1270.
Apr. 18 07 Passed Senate, ayes 44, nays 5. S.J. 1303.
Apr. 18 07 Immediate message. S.J. 1303.
Apr. 18 07 Message from Senate. H.J. 1498.
HF 2647 Status:
Inactive:
Mar. 06 06 Introduced, referred to Ways & Means. H.J. 469.
Mar. 07 06 Subcommittee, Kurtenbach, Quirk, and Soderberg. H.J. 554.
HF 2647 Description:
• State franchise structure
• LECs receive automatically
• Traditional cable must petition following expiration of existing franchise.
• Limited Definition of Gross Revenues.
• Fee limited to currently collected
• No build out
• Discrimination in deployment plans is barred, but proposal permits non-wireline (DBS) services to supplement services, so discrimination ban is really toothless.
• Permits additional terms only as provided in bill, to include:
• Comparable PEG channels
• Municipality responsible for interconnection between cable operators for PEG
• Audits limited to once a year and performed by state
Source: www.millervaneaton.com
Organizations to Contact:
Iowa League of Cities
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Louisiana Legislation
This page last updated 2/19/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HB699
Status:
HB699
Failed - Vetoed by the Governor
07/12/2006 H Vetoed by the Governor.
03/16/2006 H Prefiled.
Description:
• State franchise application structure reads much like the Michigan proposal which grants a franchise to an applicant after 45 days of filing with no provision for denial of application.
• LECs receive automatically and incumbent cable companies must petition following expiration of their existing franchise.
• Limited definition of Gross Revenues.
• No build out requirements.
• Comparable PEG channels, but no growth.
• Local governement subdivisions with a population of at least 50,000 may demand up to three PEG channels and up to two channels with less than 50,000.
Source: www.millervaneaton.com
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Maine Legislation
This page last updated 6/12/07
Maine Is First State in Nation to Pass Net Neutrality Resolve Resolution Recognizes Importance of Nondiscriminatory Access to the Internet
Contact: Shenna Bellows, 207-774-5444
Augusta- A diverse coalition of Mainers applauded the enactment today of the first net neutrality resolve in the nation. The resolution, LD 1675, recognizes the importance of “full, fair and non-discriminatory access to the Internet” and instructs the Public Advocate to study what can be done to protect the rights of Maine internet users.
"Maine is the first state in the nation to stand up for its citizens' rights to a nondiscriminatory internet," said Senator Ethan Strimling, the original sponsor of LD 1675. "The rest of the nation should follow suit and study what can be done to protect net neutrality."
“Maine is once again leading the way in protecting the rights of its citizens,” said Shenna Bellows, Executive Director of the Maine Civil Liberties Union. “This resolution will help re-establish the internet as the free and open arena of democracy it was always intended to be.”
Advocates say that restoring net neutrality is essential to protecting the right of internet users to access the information they choose. "Net neutrality principles are key to keeping control of the internet in the hands of the people," said Chellie Pingree. "With this resolution, the Legislature has put the needs of Mainers before the needs of the telecomm companies."
"This important legislation puts Maine first in affirming that Internet providers should not be allowed to discriminate by speeding up or slowing down Web content based on its source, ownership or destination,” said Tony Vigue of the Community Television Association of Maine.
Small business owners and members of the technology industry say net neutrality is good for Maine business because it allows small businesses to compete online with large corporations. Having net neutrality principles in place would make Maine an attractive place to launch tech industry start-ups. "Maine's place in the digital economy is pivotal to future economic growth,” said Lance Dutson, founder of MaineCoastDesign.com. “This resolution will allow us to see more clearly what safeguards are needed to allow Maine businesses to thrive in this new arena."
“With a free and open internet young people are able to start businesses that compete in the global marketplace from their homes in Maine,” said Brian Hiatt, Maine Director of Communications and Online Organizing for The League of Young Voters. “Net Neutrality levels the playing field for Mainers.”
As a result of a 2005 decision by the Federal Communications Commission, net neutrality principles, which had been in place since the inception of the internet, were put in jeopardy. Following that decision, Maine Senator Olympia Snowe proposed legislation to reinstate net neutrality at the federal level. Maine’s resolution emphasizes the importance of net neutrality to Snowe’s home state and could provide the impetus for her to refocus attention on the issue.
“I am delighted at this resolution’s potential for positive effect on Maine and the rest of the U.S. I look forward to reading the Public Advocate's study on Network Neutrality,” said Fletcher Kittredge, Founder and CEO of GWI, Maine’s largest Internet Service Provider.
Advocates agree that passage of the net neutrality resolution is a giant step forward. “This is a victory for everyone who uses the Internet in Maine," said Jon Bartholomew, National Media and Democracy Organizer for Common Cause. "Every Mainer who uses the web for business, to find information or to speak their minds should thank the legislature for listening to them over the giant telecommunication firms.”
The full text of the resolution follows.
Amend the bill by striking out the title and substituting the following:
‘Resolve, Regarding Full, Fair and Nondiscriminatory Access to the Internet’
Amend the bill by striking out everything after the title and before the summary and inserting the following:
‘
‘Preamble. Whereas, the Legislature finds that the development and continued enhancement of advanced communications technology in the State is vital to economic development; and
Whereas, full, fair and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet is critical to the ability of Maine citizens to participate in the information economy and is an important element of citizens’ access to information necessary to their roles as informed participants in our nation’s democracy; and
Whereas, regulation of the Internet is generally viewed as principally a matter within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government; and
Whereas, the interests of the State of Maine and its citizens must be vigorously protected; now, therefore, be it
Sec. 1 Monitoring state and federal activity relating to Internet access regulations. Resolved: That the Office of the Public Advocate shall take the following actions to monitor and review state and federal activity on issues relating to full, fair and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet. The Office of the Public Advocate shall:
1. Evaluate the actions of the Federal Communications Commission, the United States Congress and other appropriate agencies of government with respect to ensuring that citizens’ rights to full, fair and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet are not impeded;
2. Monitor the Federal Communication Commission’s inquiry into broadband industry practices, FCC-07-31, WC Docket No. 07-52;
3. Collect information on legislative and regulatory actions of other states on these issues;
4. Review the State’s telecommunications and technology policies, including the ConnectME Authority established pursuant to the Maine Revised Statutes, Title 35-A, section 9203, and evaluate the extent to which those policies are encouraging adequate investment in technology infrastructure to support a strong Internet system and continued expansion of broadband access in this State; and
5. Review the extent of the State’s authority to protect the rights of users of the Internet in the State to full, fair and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet; and be it further
Sec. 2 Report. Resolved: That, no later than February 1, 2008, the Office of the Public Advocate shall submit a report summarizing the results of its activities under section 1 to the Joint Standing Committee on Utilities and Energy.’
SUMMARY
This amendment replaces the bill with a resolve. The amendment directs the Office of the Public Advocate to take several actions to monitor state and federal activity relating to full and fair access to the Internet. The amendment requires the Office of the Public Advocate to submit a report summarizing the results of its activities to the Joint Standing Committee on Utilities and Energy by February 1, 2008.
Bill Number(s):
LR2800
Status:
Withdrawn Jan. 2006
Description:
• State authorized franchise effective 9/1/2006, or upon expiration of an existing franchise, whichever is later
• Local gov’t retains police powers and rights-of-way
• Creates a Maine Cable Franchise Board, which becomes LFA.
• 4% franchise fee based on a robust “gross revenues” definition goes to city.
• 1% of franchise fee goes to the state board
• Talks about build out, but provides no standard.
• Requires up to 3 PEG channels and establishes a PEG capital support obligation on state franchise holder, but the fee is blank in the proposed legislation.
• Permits negotiated franchises at lesser terms than that set by Board
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
More Information: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Massachusetts Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
Senate Docket 1975 read Bill
House Docket 3385
Introduced January 10, 2007 - pushed by Verizon.
Description:
Name of bill: “Consumer Choice and Competition for Cable Service Act”
S1975 Status:
Massachusetts cable franchising bill, Senate No. 1975, proposes elimination of local cable franchising
COMMITTEE HEARING SET FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 5th 10 AM,
at either Hearing Room A-1 or A-2 at the state house.
Organizations to Contact:
Keep it Local MA
MassAccess
Wrentham Cable Access
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Michigan Legislation
This page last updated 2/19/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
House Bill 6456 Passed 12/29/06 Read Bill
SB 1157 Dead 3/6/06
HB 5895 Dead 3/22/06
Status:
9/12/2006 HJ 79 Pg. 2447 introduced by Representative Mike Nofs
12/29/2006 HJ 97 Pg. 3334 approved by the Governor
12/29/2006 HJ 97 Pg. 3334 filed with Secretary of State
12/29/2006 HJ 97 Pg. 3334 assigned PA 480'06 with immediate effect
Description:
12/21/06 - HB 6456 has been signed into law by Gov. Jennifer Granholm without a Net Neutrality amendment, without buildout requirements, and allows abrogation of existing agreements without providing evidence of competition.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
Also see: Free Press
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Minnesota Legislation
This page last updated 4/29/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HF2351 “Minnesota Video Competition Act” -active
See bill status
Read bill text
Status:
03/24/2007 Introduction and first reading, referred to Commerce and Labor 1988
04/10/2007 Referred by Chair to Telecommunications Regulation and Infrastructure Division
04/12/2007 Author added Gardner 3069
04/13/2007 Division action, without further recommendation return to Commerce and Labor
Organizations to Contact:
Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via FreePress
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Missouri Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
SB 284 Read Bill
Status:
Passed in Senate and signed into law by Governor on March 22. Law in effect August 28, 2007
1/16/2007 S First Read
2/15/2007 SS for SCS, as amended, S adopted S272
2/15/2007 Perfected S272
2/19/2007 Reported Truly Perfected S Rules Committee
2/20/2007 S Formal Calendar S Bills for Third Reading
2/22/2007 Referred H Special Committee on Utilities Committee
3/22/2007 Signed by Governor
Description:
SB 284 has been introduced in the Senate. This is very similar to last year’s SB 816 with some changes to satisfy the cable industry. The new legislation would let both telcos and cablecos seek a single state franchise, which would allow them to offer service anywhere in the Missouri without the need of local approval. New language allows incumbents to apply for a state franchise immediately.
Buildout requirements have also changed — for the worse. In last year’s bill, competing telcos were required to eventually phase in their TV service to the full area served by the local cable company, instead of serving only the most densely populated or potentially profitable parts of a city. In this year’s bill, AT&T must provide access to its video service to at least 25 percent of its statewide households within three years. It also requires that within three years of beginning video service, at least 25 percent of the households served by any provider must be in low-income areas — or 30 percent in low-income areas within five years.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
Columbia Access Television
Also see: Free Press
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
New York Legislation
This page last updated 4/29/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
A1423 Read Bill inactive
S744 Read Bill inactive
A4871 Read Bill inactive
A3980-B Read Bill Active
S5124 (companion to A3980) Active
Status: A03980B - Active, revised 4/12
Omnibus telecommunications reform act of 2007
01/30/2007 referred to consumer affairs and protection
03/08/2007 amend (t) and recommit to consumer affairs and protection
03/08/2007 print number 3980a
03/16/2007 reference changed to corporations, authorities and commissions
04/12/2007 amend and recommit to corporations, authorities and commissions
04/12/2007 print number 3980b
A3980 Description:
This bill guarantees that new communications technologies will be offered to communities throughout the state, protects Network Neutrality, and provides capacity and funding for public access channels.
Net Neutrality
This bill protects Network Neutrality. In addition to prohibiting phone and cable companies from blocking sites and services, it prevents the provider of charging some sites more money in exchange for better or faster service or degrading the speed of another site. It even establishes grounds for termination of the franchise license if found in violation of Net Neutrality.
Video Franchising
The bill allows but does not require cable operators to file statewide franchises with the state. The state has 15 days to review an application for completeness, and unless incomplete, must grant the franchise within 60 days.
Build-Out Requirements
This bill does have a reasonable build-out requirement. Providers must make service available across New York within 3 years for larger communities and 6 years for smaller communities, as long as the providers are serving a substantial portion of the state with phone service. The cable company selecting the state franchise (and opting out of local agreements) cannot reduce its existing service. Redlining could bring on fines.
PEG/Public Access TV
The bill requires a match of existing PEG channel capacity and provides some flexibility for channel capacity. The bill requires the providers to pay 2% support to PEG, and if the provider is paying more than 2%, it may pay that higher rate, but no more than 3%.
Community Internet
No provisions.
Source: Free Press State Policy Tracker (Free Press supports this bill)
A4871 Description:
Sets a 30 day shot clock on Municipalities to decide on video franchise applications.
Organizations to Contact:
ACM New York
New Media Alliance
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Ohio Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s): SB 117
Read Bill
Bill Status
Status:
Introduced 03/15/07
Committee Assigned EPU
Description:
Ohio Senate Bill 117, which was introduced on March 15, 2007, will divest Ohio local governments of their cable/video franchising authority and will cost Ohio municipalities and townships millions of dollars in revenue and telecommunications support. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the grave danger that S.B. 117 poses to municipal Home Rule authority, the fiscal health of Ohio's cities, villages and townships, and local community growth and to ask for your help in stopping the Bill.
Effectively opposing this unconstitutional proposal will take an enormous effort by local governments, school districts, and public interest organizations throughout the State of Ohio. Local governments must act now if they are to preserve their cable franchise authority and prevent further erosion of Home Rule authority. Therefore, we request your immediate participation in the opposition to S.B. 117 through local legislative action, voicing your objection to the State Legislature, and providing a contribution toward the necessary funding of the efforts of Local Voice Ohio, a non-profit, state-wide coalition working to stop the Bill.
Threat Analysis:
A full summary of S.B. 117 is presented in the enclosed Client Briefing. As you will see, the Bill:
► Slashes franchise fees paid to communities by cable television operators by reducing the revenue base upon which they are calculated.
► Allows cable operators to abandon their current cable franchises.
► Significantly reduces local control of the Public Right Of Way (PROW).
► Bans Institutional Networks provided by cable companies for schools and local governments.
► Severely limits Public, Educational & Governmental (PEG) Access Channels.
► Eliminates Funding for PEG Access.
source: Local Voice Ohio
Organizations to Contact:
Save Ohio Access
Keep Access Alive>
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Pennsylvania Legislation
This page last updated 2/7/08
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HB 1490 Read Bill
referred to Consumers Affairs July 2007, Hearing Feb 7th 2008
Bill Number(s):
HB 2880 Read Bill
SB 1247
HB 2880/SB1247 Status:
10/10/06 - Both bills died in 2006. Faced with an uphill battle to interest election-focused legislators in a complex cable-reform bill, as well as loud opposition from the measure’s municipal foes, sponsors of the two proposals withdrew their legislation from consideration. A form of these Bills is expected to reappear.
Source: Free Press
Description:
Legislators introduced bills in both chambers to hasten passage.
Incumbent cable operators must honor franchise until expiration.
ILECs need not obtain a franchise to build out cable system, only need franchise to provide cable programming.
State-issued franchise without local negotiations.
Franchising authority would be assigned to the Corporation Bureau of the Department of State. Once a potential new provider files an application, the bureau will have only 15 days to issue the statewide operating permission.
The bills retain power for local governments to exercise non-discriminatory police power over the public; rights-of-way; receive and mediate disputes between franchise holders and customers for cable quality service complaints; require a local point of contact; require notice of any franchise transfer within fourteen business days after the completion of the transfer; and establish reasonable guidelines regarding the use of public, educational,and governmental access channels.
The amount of gross revenues local governments will be allowed to collect is capped at 5% with no ability to collect other taxes. PEG is somewhat preserved — up to three channels for large cities. There is limited audit authority and non recovery of audit fees and no imposition of late fee penalty or interest.
Municipalities may not require a local business office; require documents not required by federal or state law; require information about technical standards; require bonding or insurance of an entity that is eligible for self insured status; or require buildout beyond that area identified in the application.
Providers can terminate their video service at will with only 90 days’ notice. Old providers are bound to their current contracts until their negotiated termination dates, but incumbents can apply for state authority to serve outside of their current franchise areas.
Redlining is banned, but carriers have multiple outs including ability to offer DirectTV as a means to meet service requirement.
Source: www.millervaneaton.com
Organizations to Contact:
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Tennessee Legislation
This page last updated 2/18/08
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
2/25/08 UPDATE:
Tennessee has competing bills active in 2008, including a "Pro-Peg Bill HB3959.
Active Bills
HB3959/SB4021 Competitive Cable and Video Services Act Read Bill | Status
HB 1421/SB 1933 Competitive Cable and Video Services Act Read Bill | Status
Description:HB3959/SB4021
Provides for ongoing PEG funding and channel protections and the continuation of iNets. Establishes the Tennessee Cable and Video Service Authority to provide adequate oversight.
Description:HB 1421/SB 1933
The Competitive Cable and Video Services Act was introduced into the Tennessee Senate by Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro) and Doug Jackson (D-Dickson) and in the Assembly by Reps. Charles Curtiss (D-Sparta) and Steve McDaniel (R-Parkers Crossroads) on 2/13/07.
This bill is essentially refiled from last year and seeks to make the state the franchising authority for new video providers. Upon passage, the secretary of state would become the administrator of “certificates of franchise authority.”
Buildout
No build-out requirements may be required by localities.
PEG
PEG programming is clearly put at risk, with the barest requirement for video providers to provide channel capacity; if a town is not sufficiently using their channels, the video provider can reappropriate them. Whether a limit of two or three stations is instituted depends on local population levels. A kicker: if a town loses its PEG channels and somehow creates enough programming to repopulate them, the video provider must restore them, “but shall be under no obligation to carry that channel on a basic or analog tier.”
Franchise fees are effectively cut by this bill and are distributed by the state to individual localities. Past practices of asking for extra revenue to support PEG is rendered a thing of the past, ensuring that if a community didn’t have it before, it will need to convince cash-strapped local governments to support it. Institutional networks are no longer applicable.
Allies
The Tennessee Municipal League, the Tennessee Association of County Mayors and the Tennessee Cable Telecommunications Association continue to be vocal opponents of the proposed changes.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
Keep it Local Tennessee
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Utah Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
SB 209 Read Bill
Status:
1/26/07 - SB 209, “State Franchising Authority for Video Services,” was introduced into the Senate by Curts Bramble (R-16).
2/21/07 - SB 209 has passed the third reading in the Senate and was “circled.”
2/23/2007 Senate/ floor amendment S3RD
2/23/2007 Senate/ pass 3rd HCLERK 24 0 5
2/23/2007 Senate/ to House with amendments HCLERK
2/23/2007 House/ received from Senate HCLERK
2/23/2007 House/ read 1st time (Introduced) HSTRUL
2/28/2007 House/ enacting clause struck SSEC
2/28/2007 House/ to Senate SSEC
2/28/2007 Senate/ filed
Description:
SB-209 is a Qwest-backed bill on the fast-track for passage in the Utah Senate. The bill would make the state Dept. of Commerce the franchising authority. Incumbents cable operators cannot opt out of existing municipal franchises, but can use a state franchise to enter new markets. The bill would give the state 30 days to review franchise applications for completeness.
The bill is opposed by cable companies, as well as civic groups and municipalities who say it discriminates against cable incumbents and keep municipalities from protecting their residents from market abuses.
Buildout.
No buildout requirements, although redlining is prohibited.
Franchise Fees
Local franchise fees are capped at 5%.
PEG
New entrants must match the number of public access channels provided by the incumbent.
Consumer Protections
Unresolved service complaints and disputes are referred to the state court.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
N/A
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Washington Legislation
This page last updated 4/7/07
Recent State News via saveaccess: newswire
Bill Number(s):
HB 1983 Read Bill
SB 6003 Read Bill
Status:
HB 1983 - Stalled
Feb 2 First reading, referred to Technology, Energy & Communications.
SB 6003 - Stalled
Feb 13 First reading, referred to Water, Energy & Telecommunications.
Feb 20 Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Water and Energy & Telecommunications at 10:00 AM.
Description:
These bills would strip localities of their cable-franchising authority and place it in the hands of the state Utilities and Transportation Commission. That agency would have 30 calendar days to approve a statewide franchise for a new provider. Incumbent operators would be bound to the terms of their local agreements until their stated expiration dates.
Buildout
The bill specifically excludes build-out demands by local governments
PEG New providers would have to reserve space for public, educational and government channels and pay support for those channel equivalent to that paid by incumbents. The content would be the responsibility of the local governments.
These bills have already rounded up bill opponents from among the state’s mayors and from organizations such as the Urban League as well as the Broadband Communications Association of Washington.
Source: Free Press
Organizations to Contact:
Also see: Free Press State Policy Tracker
Send a letter via Free Press Take Action
Please send additional information for this page to info@saveaccess.org
Wisconsin Legislation
It's Time: National Day of Out(R)age
Join These Other Campaigns Too!
Letter to the FCC
Kevin Martin, Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
Dear Chairman Martin and FCC Commissioners:
We understand the FCC has entered into the final stages of consideration on the proposed transfer of cable systems from the bankrupt Adelphia Communications to Comcast and Time Warner. If this acquisition is approved, Comcast and Time Warner will serve more than 50% of the cable households in the United States and will be able to exercise considerable market power.
We therefore write to underscore a number of concerns raised in the proposed transaction and ask the FCC to give serious consideration to either denying the application or imposing significant conditions that will address these concerns.
Competition concerns It is imperative that the FCC seriously considers imposing conditions that will require Comcast and Time Warner to make “must have” programming available to competitors such as satellite providers.
Net Neutrality. The FCC should strongly consider a “network neutrality” provision at least as strong, if not stronger, than that imposed by the FCC in the recent mergers of Verizon/MCI and SBC/AT&T. Broadband offers a way to offer competitive telephone and video services. Even consumers with access only to Comcast or Time Warner can offset the increased market power of these companies by using broadband competitors instead.
Build out and PEG Concerns. Communities across the nation depend on their cable television as their primary form of media. In addition, many of these communities depend on the public access channels that are negotiated as conditions for the operation of cable systems.
We therefore note with alarm the history of Comcast and Time Warner unilaterally renegotiating franchise conditions after completion of a transfer. We urge the FCC to consider the conditions that would make commitments made by Comcast and Time Warner to local franchising authorities enforceable through the FCC rather than through prohibitively expensive litigation.
Programming and Political Speech. Finally, we call upon the FCC to protect diversity of programming and access to political speech. Numerous parties have brought to the FCC’s attention the willingness of Comcast and Time Warner to ignore worthy independent programmers in favor of programming they own, or affiliated with other media conglomerates. In addition, Time Warner and Comcast have refused to take political advertisements for positions they oppose, while giving themselves free time to air their own perspectives. If these two companies dominant the nation, they will have extraordinary power to stifle the vigorous, uninhibited debate essential for democratic decision-making.
In conclusion, more than 30,000 individuals, as well as organizations representing millions of others, have called upon the FCC to protect their rights to competition and free speech. We fully expect that the FCC will give these concerns their full consideration, and will impose whatever conditions it finds necessary to protect the public interest.
Sincerely,
Send this letter to the FCC Now!
MA: Massachusetts Video Franchise Bill Faces Delay
Massachusetts Video Franchise Bill Faces Delay
From Multichannel News, June 11, 2007
By Linda Haugsted
A vote on a bill that would reform cable franchising in Massachusetts, much criticized by local officials, may be headed for a 90-day delay.
The bill’s sponsor, state Sen. Steven Panagiotakos (D-Lowell) has recommended that a task force study the measure, which would move franchising authority to the state’s Department of Telecommunications and Energy. He began publicly suggesting the bill needed more work even before a June 5 hearing on the Verizon Communications Inc.-backed bill before the Joint Committee on Utilities, Telecommunications and Energy.
Though the committee did not vote on the task force, Verizon officials believe committee members will take the sponsor up on his suggestion, pushing a vote on the bill into September.
To read the article, click here.
This article is from Multichannel News. If you found it informative and valuable, we strongly encourage you to visit their Web site and register an account, if necessary, to view all their articles on the Web. Support quality journalism.
National Day of Out(R)age
We have some report-backs and media from Wednesday's actions!
BOSTON • CHICAGO • SAN FRANCISCO • NEW YORK CITY
What You Can Do! • Materials/Flyers/PSAs
If you use a telephone, the internet
or a television, this concerns your future!
On Wednesday, May 24th, thousands of people in cities across the country will protest the Telephone Companies AT&T, Bell South and Verizon. We are outraged by the tactics of the major telephone companies (AT&T, Bell South, Verizon and Qwest) to pass National Video Franchising legislation in Congress. The Telcos are spending one million dollars a week to buy the votes of Congress people for their legislation (House Bill 5252 and Senate Bill 2686), and on advertising to influence public opinion, using ‘astroturf’ groups to distort the issues. The proposed legislation will curb local control over video franchises, negatively impact thousands of local Public, Educational and Governmental Access channels, allow red-lining in low-income and rural communities and jeopardize the openness of the internet by removing ‘net neutrality’ provisions designed to promote competition.
Since the telephone industry was “de-regulated” in 1984, the number of Bell operating companies have shrunk from seven to four (three if the AT&T-Bell South merger is allowed to continue). Thousands of jobs have been lost or out-sourced and the number of independent internet service providers has declined dramatically. The telcos giants are corrupting the Congressional process to cash in on a network that has been funded by ratepayers and federal government subsidies for more than seventy years. Now they want a sweetheart deal from Congress and will stop at nothing. It is not too late to speak out on behalf of the public interest, electronic “greenspace”, open networks, consumer protections and access for all.
Recent news also has exposed the privacy violation of millions of telephone users by AT&T and Verizon who willingly handed over call records to the National Security Agency without proper legal warrants. Only Qwest challenged the legality of the NSA request. AT&T has also been in the news about it’s collusion with the NSA to install computers to track the internet traffic on their Worldnet backbone. Now these same corporation want even more access to homes throughout the country with their fiber networks. We demand accountability and better protections!
More than 500,000 people have spoken on behalf of net neutraility. Internet users, community activists and independent media producers, consumer groups, churches and are speaking out. The National Day of Out(r)age is an opportunity for everyone to make their voice heard with political action.
Specifically, we object to:
1) Telco Driven Congressional legislation that: endangers PEG access centers and channels, threatens to red-line communities, and endangers an open internet by not protecting net neutrality (HR 5252 and S.2686). Stop these legislative bills in their current form – we need more protections!
2) Telco collusion with the NSA to illegally violate the privacy of tens of millions of Americans. We demand an investigation and enforcement of the law!
3) The Telco campaign of buying off statehouse and congress people around the country to push their legislation through. We need real campaign finance reform and political transparency!
4) The Telco policy of using ‘astroturf’ groups to push their deceptions on the public. Expose these campaigns for what they are – corporate propaganda!
5) The mergers and takeovers within in the Telco industry that has resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs. Stop the AT&T – Bell South merger until there is accountability and thorough anti-trust reviews!
Cities around the country are organizing – see the list at the right that have stepped up. If you don’t see your city and are planning something - send us an email. May 24th is only the start - plan something soon!
May 24 materials
Boston protest
BOSTON • CHICAGO • SAN FRANCISCO • NEW YORK CITY
What You Can Do! • Materials/Flyers/PSAs • Protest Home
we are posting these as we receive them - but please check the local links for updates
National Day of Out(R)age – BOSTON Protest
DATE: Wednesday, May 24, 2006
RALLY: 1:30 – 2:00 PM In front of the MA State House, Beacon Street, Boston
PRESS CONFERENCE: 2:00 – 3:30 PM The Grand Staircase at the MA State House, Boston
PLACE: Massachusetts State House, Beacon Street, Boston, MA
CONTACT: Colin Rhinesmith, 617-633-0501
URL: www.acmeboston.org (Action Coalition for Media Education, Boston Chapter)
On May 24, a statewide coalition in Massachusetts will join thousands across the country for a National Day of Out(r)age to protest the telephone companies’ lobbying efforts in Congress to rewrite the nation’s telecommunications laws, in the wake of recent press reports that reveal that these same companies provided information on tens of millions of American citizens to the U.S. government!
Two bills (House Bill 5252 and Senate Bill 2686) are being considered in Congress RIGHT NOW that would:
* Reduce local control of video franchising and our public rights of way!
* Open the doors for the telecommunications giants to discriminate against low-income communities!
* Undermine the ability for PEG access centers to receive adequate funding, channels, and facilities—negatively impacting thousands of access centers across the U.S.!
* Create a two-tiered Internet: (1) A fast lane for those who can afford to ride on it, and (2) a dirt road for everybody else. This action would threaten the openness of the web, bringing the Internet as we know to an end!
Join the May 24 National Day of Out(R)age - BOSTON Coalition!
Coalition members and supporters include: Joe Dalton (District Director, Office of Congressman Ed Markey), State Representative Gloria Fox, Boston City Councilors Jerry McDermott, Sam Yoon, and Chuck Turner, David Isenberg (Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School), Mel King, Communications Workers of America District 1, MASSPIRG, Alliance for Community Media, Community Change Inc., Boston Neighborhood Producer’s Group, Project: Think Different, Boston Chapter of the Action Coalition for Media Education, Public Access TV Centers in Worcester, Fall River, Lowell, Boston, and Cambridge, teachers and students from UMass Boston, Boston College, and Emerson College and local bloggers, podcasters, and videobloggers.
This event is part of a nationwide day of protests coordinated by SaveAccess.org, a national coalition of community media organizations and individuals.
Learn More and Take Action Today!
www.saveaccess.org & www.savetheinternet.com
ACMEBoston
create * educate * mobilize
Chicago Protest
The Event:"AT&T: Bringing Us To Tiers"
The Place:Outside the AT&T / SBC building, at the intersection of Congress Parkway and South Federal Street in downtown Chicago (just a block south of the Library / State and Van Buren CTA station, immediately west of the Harold Washington Library Center)
Date/Time: Wednesday, May 24, 4pm - 6pm
AT&T and other phone companies are presently working hard to establish a "tiered Internet", where websites and Internet-based video and audio would go much faster for persons and corporations able to pay higher fees, and much slower or not at all for everyone else.
If you think this is like the Internet we have already, think again. Right now, you have a substantial measure of control of what you see on the Internet and how fast it comes to you. But you would lose that control of speed and access to content under a tiered Internet.
One key to this forced separate-and-unequal Internet is to destroy the Internet's first amendment -- the guarantee of non-discrimination of content on the Internet, or what some call "network neutrality".
A 2005 Supreme Court decision opened the door to the destruction of network neutrality, and a fight in Congress is raging now between the phone companies (and their allies in Congress) and the growing number of Internet freedom advocates (across the political spectrum, from all walks of life) over the future of the Internet.
And that's not all. Related legislation under consideration RIGHT NOW in Congress also threatens to eliminate community access television and all local control over telephone and cable TV franchising, and would likely escalate discriminatory redlining by phone and cable corporations against low-income households and communities. Plus, the fight also encompasses a growing list of scandals involving corporate and government corruption, dangerous mergers, and complicity with illegal NSA domestic spying.
If you use the Internet in any way, or if you care about local control and democracy, this fight affects you.
Start affecting it back.
Chicago Media Action, along with organizers in Boston and New York City (and a number of other cities), are planning a National Day of Media Outrage. As part of this national day of action, CMA will stage a protest and outreach effort:
We encourage you to take part, and learn more (while you still can) at these websites:
http://www.savetheinternet.com
http://www.saveaccess.org
Chicago Media Action
You can address questions about the event to Chicago Media Action (email: cma@chicagomediaaction.org; call toll free: 1-866-260-7198). Again, we encourage you to attend and spread the word about this event and these issues, and contact your elected officials - particularly U.S. Representative Bobby Rush (D-IL).
After all, it's your Internet. And it's your media. For now.
Day of Out(R)age Reportbacks
NYC Protest
BOSTON • CHICAGO • SAN FRANCISCO • NEW YORK CITY
What You Can Do! • Materials/Flyers/PSAs • Protest Home
we are posting these as we receive them - but please check the local links for updates
National Day of Out(R)age – New York City Protest
Location: Verizon World Headquarters
140 West Street at Vesey Street
Date/Time: Wednesday, May 24th 12:30-1:30 (arrive 12:15)
ACE-23 trains to Chambers St.
Organized by the saveaccess.org Coalition with Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), NYC Grassroots Media Coalition, Paper Tiger TV and more!.
MEDIA ADVISORY
Contact:
Betty Yu (917) 734-7130
Lyell Davies (917) 701-9854
DAY OF NATIONWIDE OPPOSTION TO TELCO BACKED COPE ACT
Hundreds of concerned citizens, politicians and representatives of community organizations are expected to protest against “deregulatory” phone company legislation—and the ‘million-dollar-a-week’ efforts by the telcos to pass this legislation in Washington.
The day’s activities are being coordinated by “Saveaccess”—citizens concerned about the damage the COPE bill (H.R. 5252) and Senate bill S.2686 would do to Public, Educational and Governmental (PEG) TV in New York City and elsewhere. Protests nationwide are targeting Verizon, AT&T, and BellSouth.
The proposed legislation illustrates the growing rift between NYC and Washington on telecommunications policy. On May 10th the NYC City Council unanimously passed a city Resolution in opposition to this legislation.
The COPE bill has been widely criticized for proposing changes in existing telco franchising rules—including:
1) Allowing ‘video-service’ phone and cable companies to “redline” communities they see as unprofitable—thereby increasing the digital divide.
2) Dismantling current provisions for ‘Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) TV’.
3) Changing the Internet as we know it by removing ‘Network Neutrality’ requirements—allowing Internet companies to introduce ‘pay-as-you-go’ charges.
4) Ending local franchising and replacing it with a federal franchise—ending completely local accountability by the phone companies.
The planned day of “Out(R)age” is intended to highlight popular opposition to this legislation—and to counter the aggressive lobbying efforts of the telcos who are reportedly spending over a million dollars a week on lobbying efforts, advertising campaigns, and on the funding of ‘astroturf’ front groups which appear to show grassroots public support for COPE—but are actually telco front organizations.
In recent months over 500,000 people expressed their opposition to COPE by writing or calling elected representatives. May 24th will be the most visible expression of opposition to COPE yet organized.
The propose legislation has been called a phone company “give-away” at a time when many are criticizing the phone companies’ illegal disclosure to the NSA of private information about millions of Americans—and at a time when telco mergers threaten competition and consumer protections.
Around the country dozens of local governance bodies are opposed to this legislation—including the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, US Conference of Mayors, and the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA). Protests have been scheduled in New York, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco—details of additional cities still to be announced.
San Francisco Protest
BOSTON • CHICAGO • SAN FRANCISCO • NEW YORK CITY
What You Can Do! • Materials/Flyers/PSAs • Protest Home
we are posting these as we receive them - but please check the local links for updates
National Day of Out(R)age SF Style
San Francisco participates in National Day of Out(R)age
Wednesday, May 24th, 2006
Two Community Actions hosted by Media Alliance
12 Noon at AT&T Park
Join media advocates & community activists out front of the SF Giants game for some activist style theatrical sports. Help make the point that consumers won't play ball with AT&T and other Telcos that play ball with the NSA.
4:00pm - 6:00pm at AT&T's main San Francisco headquarters 666 Folsom Street - between 2nd & 3rd
Join media advocates & community activists in front of the building where AT&T worked to deliver private information about consumers to the NSA. Dress up as a 21st century spy or online information secret agent to help make the point that your online privacy cannot be sold to the Telcos!!!
Read the overview below to get up to speed on key issues that are driving this national day of protest that will unfold in San Francisco, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago & New York. Learn more at http://www.saveaccess.org
& http://www.savetheinternet.com.
To participate in noon action, please email: jeffp123@gmail.com
Media Alliance
What You Can Do
BOSTON • CHICAGO • SAN FRANCISCO • NEW YORK CITY
What You Can Do! • Materials/Flyers/PSAs • Protest Home
This is only the start . . .
May 24th is only the beginning. Our aim is to generate public knowledge about the telco legislation and misdeeds. This will take time - but the legislation is moving fast in the House and also the Senate - so we can't delay.
So even if you can't organize a protest for the 24th - plan one in the near future - and let us know when and where (mail: protest@saveaccess.org). Send us your photos and video!
Even if it's not possible to organize in your local community - you can distribute informational flyers (hint - go to a Verizon/AT&T/Bell South/Qwest store). The more people learn about this the better! We still need many more letters to Congress - see 'take action' and send an email to Congress and your friends.
Boston Press Release 5.22
National Day of Out(R)age – BOSTON
DATE: Wednesday, May 24, 2006
RALLY: 1:30 – 2:00 PM In Front of the Massachusetts State House, Beacon Street, Boston
PRESS CONFERENCE: 2:00 – 3:30 PM The Grand Staircase, Massachusetts State House, Beacon Street, Boston
PLACE: Massachusetts State House, Beacon Street, Boston, MA
CONTACT: Colin Rhinesmith, 617-633-0501
URL: www.acmeboston.org (Action Coalition for Media Education, Boston Chapter)
On May 24, a statewide coalition in Massachusetts will join thousands across the country for a National Day of Out(r)age to protest the telephone companies’ lobbying efforts in Congress to rewrite the nation’s telecommunications laws, in the wake of recent press reports that reveal that these same companies provided information on tens of millions of American citizens to the U.S. government!
Two bills (House Bill 5252 and Senate Bill 2686) are being considered in Congress RIGHT NOW that would:
* Reduce local control of video franchising and our public rights of way!
* Open the doors for the telecommunications giants to discriminate against low-income communities!
* Undermine the ability for PEG access centers to receive adequate funding, channels, and facilities—negatively impacting thousands of access centers across the U.S.!
* Create a two-tiered Internet: (1) A fast lane for those who can afford to ride on it, and (2) a dirt road for everybody else. This action would threaten the openness of the web, bringing the Internet as we know to an end!
Join the May 24 National Day of Out(R)age - BOSTON Coalition!
Coalition members and supporters include: Joe Dalton (District Director, Office of Congressman Ed Markey), State Representative Gloria Fox, Boston City Councilors Jerry McDermott, Sam Yoon, and Chuck Turner, David Isenberg (Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School), Mel King, Communications Workers of America District 1, MASSPIRG, Alliance for Community Media, Community Change Inc., Boston Neighborhood Producer’s Group, Project: Think Different, Boston Chapter of the Action Coalition for Media Education, Public Access TV Centers in Worcester, Fall River, Lowell, Boston, and Cambridge, teachers and students from UMass Boston, Boston College, and Emerson College and local bloggers, podcasters, and videobloggers.
This event is part of a nationwide day of protests coordinated by SaveAccess.org, a national coalition of community media organizations and individuals.
Learn More and Take Action Today!
www.saveaccess.org & www.savetheinternet.com
ACMEBoston
create * educate * mobilize
www.acmeboston.org
Chicago Press Release 5.22
Mitchell Szczepanczyk | Save the internet:
http://www.szcz.org | http://www.savetheinternet.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Chicago Media Action
P.O. Box 14140, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
1-866-260-7198 (voicemail)
1-773-641-2151 (cellphone)
www.chicagomediaaction.org
cma@chicagomediaaction.org
CHICAGO ACTIVISTS TARGET AT&T OVER INTERNET, PRIVACY, AND CORRUPTION
May 18, 2006 -- Chicago activists will hold a protest action on Wednesday, May 24, at 4pm, against AT&T, entitled "AT&T: Bringing Us To Tiers". The Chicago action, one of a series of actions on a nationwide day of protest against major phone and cable companies, will take place at the AT&T offices at the intersection of Congress Parkway and South Federal Street,
immediately west of the Harold Washington Library Center in downtown Chicago.
At particular issue is the internet's first amendment -- the guarantee of non-discrimination of internet content, which some call "network neutrality". Related legislation under consideration in Congress would eliminate community access television and all local control of telephone and cable TV franchising. This would also likely escalate discriminatory redlining by phone and cable corporations against low-income households and communities. Locally, AT&T is suing six Chicago suburbs over public right of ways. These issues are also punctuated by a growing list of scandals involving corporate and government corruption, dangerous mergers, and complicity with illegal NSA domestic spying.
The demonstration and outreach, organized by the media reform group Chicago Media Action, will spotlight the phone giant's legislative and legal assaults on Chicagoans' rights and freedoms, including its attempt to severely compromise network neutrality.
AT&T and other phone companies are presently working to establish a "tiered internet", where websites and internet-based video and audio would download much faster for persons and corporations able to pay higher fees, and much slower or not at all for everyone else. This is unlike the internet we currently enjoy in that, right now, users have a substantial measure of control of what is viewed on the internet and its speed. But that consumer control of speed and access would likely fall prey to these companies. A diversity of smaller community groups would stand among the losers in this scheme.
The May 24 Chicago action is part of a "National Day of Media Outrage", with similar protest actions by grassroots organizations in other cities, including New York City, Boston, and San Francisco. To learn more, visit savetheinternet.com, saveaccess.org, and chicagomediaaction.org
FAIR Press Release 5.22
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
MAY 22, 2006
3:31 PM
CONTACT: Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
212-633-6700
National Day of Out(R)age
NEW YORK - May 22 - SaveAccess.org, a national coalition of community media organizations and individuals, is coordinating a nationwide day of protests with actions taking place in New York City, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco on Wednesday, May 24th.
FAIR is helping to organize the New York City protest. Join us. Make your voice heard.
Wednesday, May 24th at the Verizon World Headquarters
140 West Street (at Vesey Street).
12:30-1:30pm (Pre-assemble at 12:15pm)
A/C/E/2/3 trains to Chambers St.
www.saveaccess.org/protest
(Times and locations of other nationwide actions listed below)
We are protesting:
1) Telco-driven congressional legislation (HR 5252 and S.2686) that endangers public access centers and channels, threatens to red-line communities, and undermines an open internet by not protecting net neutrality.
We need to stop these bills in their current form -- we need more protections.
2) Telco collusion with the NSA to illegally violate the privacy of tens of millions of Americans.
We need to demand an investigation and enforcement of the law.
3) The Telco campaign to buyoff statehouse and congressional representatives around the country to push their legislation through.
We need real campaign finance reform and political transparency.
4) The Telco policy of using “astroturf” groups to push their deceptions on the public.
We need to expose these campaigns for what they are -- corporate propaganda.
5) The mergers and takeovers within in the Telco industry that have resulted in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.
We need to stop the AT&T - BellSouth merger until there is accountability and thorough anti-trust reviews.
Other Day Of Out(r)age actions across the country include:
Boston
Rally: 1:30 – 2:00 pm In front of the Massachusetts State House, Beacon Street
Press Conference: 2:00 – 3:30 pm The Grand Staircase at the Massachusetts State House
URL: www.acmeboston.org (Action Coalition for Media Education, Boston Chapter)
Chicago
The Event: "AT&T: Bringing Us To Tiers"
The Place: Outside the AT&T / SBC building, at the intersection of Congress Parkway and South Federal Street in downtown Chicago (just a block south of the Library / State and Van Buren CTA station, immediately west of the Harold Washington Library Center)
Date/Time: Wednesday, May 24, 4pm - 6pm
San Francisco
Two Community Actions hosted by Media Alliance
12 Noon at AT&T Park
Join media advocates & community activists out front of the SF Giants game for some activist style theatrical sports. Help make the point that consumers won't play ball with AT&T and other Telcos that play ball with the NSA.
4:00pm - 6:00pm at AT&T's main San Francisco headquarters 666 Folsom Street - between 2nd & 3rd
More info at: http://saveaccess.org/protest
Members of the SaveAccess.org Coalition include:
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), NYC Grassroots Media Coalition, Paper Tiger TV, Center for Digital Democracy, Free Press, Association for Community Networking, Action Coalition for Media Education, Chicago Media Action, Media Alliance, Media Tank, CCTV-Cambridge and the Center for Media & Democracy
saveaccess.org nyc Press Release 5.22
saveaccess.org
info@saveaccess.org
MEDIA ADVISORY
Contacts: Lyell Davies (917) 701-9854
Michael Eisenmenger (646) 245-3491
National Day of Out(R)age Against the Phone Companies
On May 24th Major Cities Across the U.S. say --
“Hands off our Public Access, our Internet, and our Privacy”
New York—Wednesday, May 24th @ 12:30pm Verizon World Headquarters,
140 West Street (corner of Vesey Street)
On Wednesday May 24th concerned citizens, community advocates and media activists in cities across the United States will join together for a National Day of Out(R)age to protest the ‘million-dollar-a-week’ “deregulatory” efforts of the major telecommunications companies (AT&T, Verizon, Bell South and Qwest) to advance legislation in Congress that would rewrite U.S. telecommunications policy, negatively impacting millions of local communities, citizens, consumers and the city government.
Public events and demonstrations will be held throughout the day on May 24th in New York, Chicago, Boston and San Francisco to draw public attention to the phone companies multi-million dollar campaign to buy Congressional votes and public support for the “COPE Act” (HR 5252/ S 2686), legislation that seeks end local franchising by replacing it with national franchising. The phone/telecommunications companies are fast-tracking this legislation that would allow them to enter the video service market by eliminating local franchising, open access and public interest requirements.
If passed, the “COPE Act” will remove local authority of video franchises from cities and towns, allow the 'red-lining' of low income and rural communities, negatively impact local Public, Educational and Governmental (PEG) Access channels, and jeopardize the openness of the internet by removing Net Neutrality provisions. The “COPE Act” (House Bill 5252) is slated for a vote by the House within the next week and Senate Bill version (S.2686) is scheduled for markup on June 20th.
The May 24th National Day of Out(R)age will also highlight the recent exposure of the privacy violation of millions of telephone users by AT&T, Bell South and Verizon who willingly handed over call records to the National Security Agency without proper legal warrants. “ AT&T and Verizon want to away with consumer protections and have even more access to homes throughout the country - and to your information – with their planned fiber networks for video and Internet services. This would provide far more capacity than the current copper wire connections - hence the slogan, 'your world delivered'” says Jeff Perlstein, of Media Alliance and organizer of the San Francisico protest.
The National Day of Out(R)age is organized by the Saveaccess.org, a national coalition of concerned citizens, media activists, community based organizations, members of Public Access media centers. Across the U.S., they are joined together to demand that the phone companies be accountable to local communities and to protect the future of telecommunications infrastructure to the public interest. Around the country dozens of local cities and towns are opposed to this legislation—including the National League of Cities, US Conference of Mayors, and the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA).
In New York, the organizations involved in Wednesday’s actions include: Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), NYC Grassroots Media Coalition, Paper Tiger TV, NABET-CWA Local 11, National Mobilization Against SweatShops, Picture the Homeless, Interreligious Foundation for Community Organizations, Community Voices Heard, and Chinese Staff & Workers Association.
News Items
NYC Resolution
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
RESOLUTION NO. 136-A
Resolution calling on the New York Congressional Delegation and all other members of Congress to oppose several bills that have been introduced into the 109th Congress of the United States —Senate Bills S. 1349 and S. 1504 and House of Representatives Bill H.R. 3146—along with the proposed bill of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee entitled The Communications, Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement Act of 2006 (referred to as COPE”) which would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to restrict, if not eliminate, local franchising and severely undermine community programming and the implementation of universal, affordable broadband access.
By Council Members Brewer, Katz, James, Martinez, Foster, Palma, Arroyo, Barron, Clarke, Comrie and Felder
Whereas, public, educational, and governmental ("PEG") access provides thousands of hours of local programs each week to New York City residents, such as City Council meetings and hearings, community and neighborhood events and forums, foreign language programming health care information, school sports, services for houses of worship, and legislative updates and public access channels in all five boroughs allow New York City residents to exercise their First Amendment Rights and to create opportunities for non-commercial communication, education, artistic expression on an open and equitable basis; and
Whereas, local cable franchising allows municipalities around the country to exercise local authority and receive franchise fees for the use of public rights-of-way in order to meet the specific public access, community programming, consumer protection, public safety, and technology needs of residents and businesses; and
Whereas, the City Council of New York contends that the City’s future economic success depends on universal, affordable broadband access and that the only way to achieve this objective is if New York City has the authority to regulate at the local level to help increase and improve broadband services for underserved residents; and
Whereas, existing law enables New York City (through local franchise agreements with cable television companies) to offer City residents vibrant and diverse local programming, Public Access channels in all five boroughs, and the City run Educational and Governmental channels; and
Whereas, existing law supports the objectives of localism and universal service by providing states and municipalities sufficient rights to manage local build out of services and determine local public access needs; and
Whereas, these bills could prevent New York City and other municipalities around the nation from requiring Multi Channel Video Providers (including cable or telecommunications companies) and advanced Internet communications service providers from having to obtain a franchise from the City for the use of City rights-of-way, thus impeding each municipality’s ability to (i) control the use of its own resources, and (ii) determine what is required to meet local access needs; and
Whereas, these bills could nationalize franchising, which would remove local protection for consumers and would transfer effective local enforcement to the federal bureaucracy or the courts; and
Whereas, these bills may eliminate any build-out requirements for any video service provider, allowing providers to "red-line" and discriminate based on the wealth of the local neighborhoods they choose to serve; and
Whereas, these bills could substantially reduce the city's compensation for use of its rights of way by private companies and also reduce financial and operational support for PEG access; and
Whereas, although these bills contain some provisions that require companies to dedicate channel capacity to PEG access, they could lower the number of required PEG access channels and limit or eliminate support for public infrastructure like the I-Net (Institutional Network), which supports public safety, schools, emergency services and municipal communications; and
Whereas, although these bills contain some provisions that require PEG access, a Federal one-size-fits-all approach to public access does not serve the public interest in New York City because it does not take into account the local needs and circumstances that are unique to the City; and
Whereas, passage of these bills paves the way for the cable and telecommunications companies that have existing local franchise agreements with municipalities to lobby Congress to amend Federal law to exempt them from local franchise obligations; and
Whereas, these bills are unnecessary; because under existing law, telephone companies may enter the video market as common carriers, as open video service providers, or under the same franchising framework as cable companies; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the City Council of New York opposes, and urges the New York Congressional Delegation and all other members of Congress to oppose, Senate bills S. 1349 and S. 1504 and House bill H.R. 3146, as well as COPE and any other similar legislative proposals.
Res 1280/2005
CS
OH: House Committee Version Preserves Local Video Franchising
House committee version of SB 117 preserves local video franchising for most Ohio communities
Source: http://www.callahansclevelanddiary.com/?p=284
Well, you just never know, do you?
The House Public Utilities Committee unanimously approved a heavily amended version of Substitute Senate Bill 117 yesterday evening, after a full afternoon of closed-door caucuses. Evidently the weeks of lobbying by cities, public access and consumer groups were worth the effort, because the Committee sent the full House a much more reasonable bill than it received from the Senate.
The Governor got real oversight power for his Commerce Department, which will now be able to levy fines and even terminate the franchises of state Video Service Providers that violate the new law’s requirements on buildout, redlining, reporting or customer service. Cities and public access advocates represented by Local Voice Ohio got significant improvements in the franchise fee and PEG channel rules that will apply to state-franchised video providers.
But most important, the Committee adopted an amendment proposed by Rep. Louis Blessing (R-Cinci) that allows an incumbent cable company to “opt out” of a municipal franchise and switch to a state Video Service Authorization only when 25% of the residents in the franchise community have access to a competing wireline video service. In other words, if there’s no real competition, there’s no switching to the state franchising system.
The Blessing amendment, if it survives the House-Senate conference process, will preserve local cable franchising for the majority of Ohio communities (those that don’t get their phone service from AT&T) , as well as AT&T communities that don’t get targeted for “U-Verse” fiber-enhanced broadband video service. Since Cleveland is likely to fall in the latter category, the Blessing amendment probably means that Time Warner will have to negotiate a new franchise with Cleveland City Council after all.
Something tells me the cable companies are going to be very unhappy about this turn of events — which is why it ain’t over till the conference committee sings. But the House will pass the Committee version in a day or two, and then AT&T will have every reason to push for a quick reconciliation and final adoption, no matter how unhappy that makes Time Warner.
(Left on the Committee’s cutting-room floor: Rep. Mike Foley’s anti-abandonment language and “Connect Ohio” . The Blessing amendment probably makes the abandonment issue moot, at least for a while. Connect Ohio will be back.)
Organizing