Posted on January 24, 2008 - 7:59am.
  
  from:  Free Expression Policy Project
A Federal Court Stops Comcast's Plan to Exile Public
        Access Channels to Cable Siberia - At Least for Now
(January 16, 2008) - The large cable companies that sell the public its
        "basic tier" and premium TV services have never liked "PEG"
        (public, educational, and governmental) channels. But this week in Michigan,
        a federal judge stopped the biggest of the cable giants, Comcast, from
        reassigning PEG channels from the basic tier to high-numbered, difficult-to-find
        spaces in the digital spectrum, and requiring customers to buy new digital
        converters in order to view them.
PEG channel access is often required by the franchising agreements between
        municipalities and cable companies - the same agreements that give the
        companies monopoly power to provide service, set rates, and decide what
        programs will be available on almost all the other channels on the TV
        dial. (The only other exception are a few channels that, under federal
        law, must be set aside for commercial "leased access.") 
The court challenge to Comcast's plan was brought by two Michigan towns,
        Dearborn and Meridian. They claimed that the plan discriminated against
        PEG channels in violation of federal law and the local franchising agreements,
        and that it would cost PEG channels - including those used by public school
        districts, community colleges, and the state university system - a large
        part of their audience. In addition, although Comcast was offering subscribers
        one free converter box for a year in order to ease the transition, each
        TV set in the home needs its own box, and subscribers would have to pay
        for all the boxes after the year was up. 
In her January 14 decision, Judge Victoria Roberts of the U.S. District
        Court agreed with the plaintiffs that the additional costs were discriminatory,
        in probable violation of federal law, although moving the location of
        PEG channels in itself probably would be permissible. Because of the likely
        harm to the towns' PEG channels, she prohibited Comcast from implementing
        its plan until the lawsuit is finally resolved.
Comcast's plan is part of a larger effort to eliminate or marginalize
        PEG access. The company argued that recent legislation in Michigan "preempted"
        the requirements of federal law by providing an alternative to local cable
        franchising. But Judge Roberts pointed out that federal law necessarily
        preempts state law on the same subject, and federal law requires that
        PEG channels be made available to all community members "on a nondiscriminatory
        basis," and "at the lowest reasonable rate."
Deborah Guthrie, the Meridian Township cable coordinator, told the Detroit
        Free Press that Comcast’s plan would cost basic subscribers $4-$5
        per month per television for access boxes, and would deprive many lower-income
        subscribers, especially senior citizens living on fixed incomes, of public,
        educational and government-access channels. 
According to Multichannel
        News, "Pressure had been building on Comcast’s PEG moves
        for several weeks." Congressman Edward Markey scheduled a January
        29 hearing on "PEG Services in the Digital TV Age." Rep. John Dingell
        of Michigan commended the court’s decision to block Comcast’s plan because
        it "would have forced many Michigan consumers to pay additional fees
        to rent set-top boxes to receive the high-quality educational programming
        they are currently guaranteed with basic cable service." Another
        Michigan congressman, Bart Stupak, agreed, saying: “PEG channels serve
        an essential role in local communities and I was pleased to see the court
        block an effort to make these channels available only to digital cable
        subscribers. As media consolidation continues to increase, PEG channels
        become even more vital in providing a much needed local voice and diversity
        of opinion.” 





For a complete chronology of the Comcast/PEG controversy, see http://saveaccess.org/aggregator/sources/12
For legal documents in the case, see the Miller
        Van Eaton law firm website .
See also Harold Feld's commentary at on the Free
        Press website. 
For background on PEG access and threats it faces in the current regulatory
        environment, see FEPP's Fact
        Sheets on Media Democracy, Survey
        on the Legal Needs of Media Reform Organizations, and Comments
        to the FCC in the Matter of Broadcast Localism.