<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - CONNECTICUT</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CT: Is the face of public access programming changing?</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2295</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://simsburytv.org/blog/2008/04/is-face-of-public-access-programming.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Simsbury Community TV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, April 15, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Is the face of public access programming changing?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could revisions to a bill passed by the House last year change the way West Hartford residents view public access programming?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the question some public access leaders are asking after members of the Connecticut House of Representatives convened to revise the language of a 2007 bill deregulating the cable broadcasting market in the state. Supporters of the bill hoped it would stimulate competition by allowing new entrants into Connecticut&#039;s television broadcasting market.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:38:35 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Video Clips of Connecticut Public Hearing on PEG Access TV</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2260</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rghm.wordpress.com/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Community Media Clippings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Video Clips of Connecticut Public Hearing on PEG Access TV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
March 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On March 7 Connecticut&#039;s Joint Committee on Energy &amp;amp; Technology held a 4-hour hearing on HB 5814, a bill to amend their recent statewide video franchising law. Connecticut PEG access advocates are asking to have two essential protections added:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:13:20 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: U-Verse&#039;s Sorry Excuse For Public Access TV</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2257</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/UVerses-Sorry-Excuse-For-Public-Access-TV-92721&quot; target=blank&quot;&gt; Broadband Reports&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U-Verse&#039;s Sorry Excuse For Public Access TV&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
CT&#039;s version of public access CSPAN a little annoyed....&lt;br /&gt;
Monday Mar 17 2008 by Karl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Verizon and AT&amp;amp;T lobbyists &lt;a href=&quot;/shownews/82501&quot;&gt;worked to eliminate&lt;/a&gt; the local video franchise system, consumer advocates pointed out that such moves resulted in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freepress.net/news/22057&quot;&gt;death of public access&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:06:39 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Hartford Public Access May Be on U-verse After 18-Month Delay</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2242</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nhregister.com/WebApp/appmanager/JRC/BigDaily?_nfpb=true&amp;amp;_pageLabel=pg_article&amp;amp;r21.pgpath=%2FNHR%2FNews%2FTowns&amp;amp;r21.&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; New Haven Register&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hartford Public Access May Be on U-verse After 18-Month Delay&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;March 8, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
By Luther Turmelle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Local public access television channels could make their debut on AT&amp;amp;T’s U-verse system by sometime next month, 16 months after the service was launched in the state, company officials said Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:18:23 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Regular channels on AT$T sought for community access [extended report]</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2241</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrecordjournal.com/site/tab1.cfm?newsid=19372117&amp;amp;BRD=2755&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=592709&amp;amp;rfi=6&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Record Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Regular channels on AT&amp;amp;T sought for community access [extended report]&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
by George Moore&lt;br /&gt;
MyRecordJournal.com (CT)&lt;br /&gt;
03/07/08&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HARTFORD - Public television officials and others argued before the state legislature Friday that AT&amp;amp;T should be required to offer community access and government television as regular channels in its new U-verse television service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:16:31 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: U-Verse:cable comparison of PEG</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2237</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctn.state.ct.us/compare/AT&amp;amp;T%20U-verse%20Launch%20Tests.wmv&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; CTN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U-Verse:cable comparison of PEG&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the past few months, AT&amp;amp;T has introduced its U-Verse to Connecticut.  In the past week, the state legislature (in short session this year) has started to introduce amendments to the Certified Video Service Competition law from last year.  On 3/8/08, the proposed bill had a hearing for almost 4 hours.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:18:49 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Blogging interrupted by citizenship</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2236</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://adelehouston.blogspot.com/2008/03/blogging-interrupted-by-citizenship.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Glimpses Through Stained Glass&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Saturday, March 8, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Blogging interrupted by citizenship&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Members of the Energy &amp;amp; Technology Committee:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I, ..., current Chairman of the Cable Advisory Council Comcast Branford and Statewide Video Council designee; DO NOT SUPPORT HB5814, An Act Concerning Community Access Television. [I do however support Community Access TV in to the wee hours of the morning.]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:13:56 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Public access channels may be on U-verse by next month</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2235</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nhregister.com/WebApp/appmanager/JRC/BigDaily?_nfpb=true&amp;amp;_pageLabel=pg_article&amp;amp;r21.pgpath=%2FNHR%2FNews%2FTowns&amp;amp;r21.content=%2FNHR%2FNews%2FTowns%2FHeadlineList_Story_1705035&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; New Haven Register&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Posted on Sat, Mar 8, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Public access channels may be on U-verse by next month&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Luther Turmelle, North Bureau Chief&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HARTFORD — Local public access television channels could make their debut on AT&amp;amp;T’s U-verse system by sometime next month, 16 months after the service was launched in the state, company officials said Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:11:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Regular channels on AT$T sought for community access</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2234</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://myrecordjournal.com/site/tab1.cfm?newsid=19372117&amp;amp;BRD=2755&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=592709&amp;amp;rfi=6&quot;  target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Record Journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Regular channels on AT&amp;amp;T sought for community access&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By: George Moore, Staff&lt;br /&gt;
03/07/2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HARTFORD - Public television officials and others argued before the state legislature Friday that AT&amp;amp;T should be required to offer community access and government television as regular channels in its new U-verse television service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:05:55 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Public access may be hard to access on U-verse</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2225</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myrecordjournal.com/site/tab1.cfm?newsid=19363828&amp;amp;BRD=2755&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=592708&amp;amp;rfi=6&quot; target&quot;blank&quot;&gt; My Record journal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Public access may be hard to access on U-verse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By: George Moore, staff 8:20 pm&lt;br /&gt;
03/05/2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WALLINGFORD - The ability to find public access shows while channel surfing will play a central role in a struggle between public access advocates and AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s new television service, U-verse.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:48:58 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: Exploded AT$T Batteries Raise Concerns - Video</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2083</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Note: Attorney General Richard Blumenthal took AT&amp;amp;T to court when they refused to seek franchising in the state. He&#039;s likely to ride the company hard until they replace every battery in Connecticut.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wfsb.com/money/15106235/detail.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; WFSB News 3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exploded AT&amp;amp;T Batteries Raise Concerns&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Company Says It&#039;s Removing Batteries From Streets&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:26:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: AT$T Got Special Favor</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1903</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hartfordbusiness.com/news3869.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Hartford Business&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LETTER TO THE EDITOR&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Got Special Favor&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;12/03/07&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To The Editor:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I take this opportunity as the state’s Consumer Counsel to address several inaccuracies in a letter to the editor filed on Nov. 12, 2007 by AT&amp;amp;T’s president in response to an editorial in the Journal (“Scrambled Signals,” October 29, 2007). This is a situation in which AT&amp;amp;T’s cries about fairness ring false: the loser here will be the state’s video services consumers and indeed the market for those services itself. AT&amp;amp;T has spent millions of dollars in a campaign around the country selling legislatures and regulators on the magic that could result from freeing it from regulation, without mentioning that where this one company “wins,” consumers and its competitors must necessarily lose.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:57:01 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: U-verse given the green light in Connecticut</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1818</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fierceiptv.com/story/u-verse-given-green-light-connecticut/2007-11-06&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Fierce IPTV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;U-verse given the green light in Connecticut&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
November 6, 2007&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T has been granted a franchise for its IPTV U-verse service in Connecticut after a state court overturned a decision by the local utility regulator which required U-verse to have to get a franchise in each area in which it wanted to  operate. The decision is an important precedent and clears the way for similar state-level clearance to facilitate the rapid roll out of the broadband infrastructure necessary to support IPTV and other high access services. AT&amp;amp;T becomes the first competitor to offer television services under a new state law designed to increase competition with the cable industry.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:35:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: IPTV and Consumer Choice</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1814</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://7towntv.org/ct_acm.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; 7 Town TV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IPTV and Consumer Choice&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is the same story but CT is now the playing field Telecom &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Throughout the entire time-line of public discourse about U-verse, which includes both regulatory &amp;amp; court proceedings, at&amp;amp;t has funded a marketing campaign that presents itself as a consumer choice organization (MoreConsumerChoice.org and wewantchoice.com). at&amp;amp;t is currently running the TV4US campaign with pro at&amp;amp;t letter being auto-generation to DPUC. This campaign strategically locates TV4US ADs near articles on the U-verse debate. (Such Ads have appeared in web version of NH Register, Record-Journal, Hartford Courant.) This is polluting the information integrity associated with this market competition issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:34:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CT: AT$T U-verse Deploys in Connecticut Stirs Controversy</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1813</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/439099/att_uverse_deploys_in_connecticut_stirs.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;Associated Content&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AT&amp;amp;T U-verse Deploys in Connecticut Stirs Controversy&lt;br /&gt;
Can Someone Buy Your Free Speech?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By adelehouston&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The free speech of hundreds of consumers was paid for in advertising funds expended by AT&amp;amp;T this year. In a recent campaign to deploy U-verse in Connecticut (a timeline of events can be found here; http://7towntv.org/ct_acm.htm ) a massive marketing campaign rallied consumers to fight for competition and fair prices. It was slick.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/45">CONNECTICUT</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:27:32 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
