<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://saveaccess.org">
<channel>
 <title>Save Access - Cablevision</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cable fee battles point to smaller TV bundles</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2344</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60B59120100112&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Reuters&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tue, Jan 12 2010&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Yinka Adegoke - Analysis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEW YORK (Reuters) - Cable companies, burdened by the cost of programing, are starting to seriously consider something they have long resisted: letting television subscribers pay for just those channels they want to watch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For years consumer advocates, regulators and politicians have argued that cable TV providers should allow consumers to choose their own TV channels or buy smaller packages, rather than bundle around 100 fixed channels at prices usually starting around $50 a month.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:14:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lawmakers Press FCC On AT$T&#039;s Public Program Offerings</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2338</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.morningstar.com/newsnet/printNews.aspx?article=/DJ/200809171410DOWJONESDJONLINE000870_univ.xml&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; The Morning Star&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Lawmakers Press FCC On AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s Public Program Offerings&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
9-17-08 2:10 PM EDT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- Members of a powerful House committee are pressing the Federal Communications Commission to put a stop to how AT&amp;amp;T Inc. (T) offers public and educational programming on its fledgling paid TV service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:59:17 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Verminators!</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2337</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riedelcommunications.blogspot.com/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Riedel Communications&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More Verminators!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the eve of a Congressional hearing regarding what has happened to Public, Educational and Government (PEG) access channels since the passage of statewide or state issued franchise legislation, it is heartening to note that the cable and telecom industries (and the FCC) have severely overplayed their hand. Tomorrow, the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government will hear a laundry list of harms done to PEG in what appears to be an industry-wide effort to bury and destroy these local channels. An effort that was spawned by the FCC’s First and Second Report and Order on Video Franchising and the nineteen states that passed the state legislation. These harms come at a time when Congress and the American people are acutely sensitive to media consolidation and the loss of localism.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/15">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/17">FCC Video Franchise</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:56:27 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Subcommittee Hearing on Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) Access for Cable</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2336</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The following link is scheduled to provide a live look at this morning&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://appropriations.edgeboss.net/wmedia-live/appropriations/33698/282_appropriations-happrops_080213.asx&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt;subcommittee meeting on PEG:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://appropriations.edgeboss.net/wmedia-live/appropriations/33698/282_appropriations-happrops_080213.asx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Background:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government Hearing on Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) Access for Cable Television&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:11:51 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Cablevision fights back</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2230</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libn.com/article.htm?articleID=41647&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Long Island Business News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cablevision fights back&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Pete Weiss&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, March 7, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Verizon first cracked the Long Island market with its vaunted FiOS television service, some analysts – and the company itself – predicted subscribers would leave Cablevision in droves for the phone company’s video service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 08:02:29 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Analog is Dead. Long Live Analog</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt; A very useful article for sorting out all the broadcast digital transition (DTV) misinformation in the media these days. It also highlights cable company strategies for playing the transition to their own end (the cable digital transition deadline isn&#039;t until Feb 2012). Lost here is any mention of affordable &#039;basic&#039; cable service, the tier of analog service consisting of local broadcast and PEG channels priced to ensure that low-income and fixed income families can afford basic local TV service. We need to ensure that digital cable affords this tier of service for those that need it most.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533127.html?nid=4262&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Analog is Dead. Long Live Analog&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why Cable Won’t Go All-Digital By Feb. 18, 2009, Even If Broadcasters Will&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 2/18/2008 8:22:00 AM&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is analog TV an albatross for cable?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/51">DTV Transition</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NY: Where PEG Fits In Squarely</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2169</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://facilities.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=303406&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Multichannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Where PEG Fits In Squarely&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; _ At a public hearing in New York City on Jan. 17, a man stood up and told city officials about a category of local programming that is cable-exclusive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;You&#039;re not going to find this on satellite,&quot; the man said. &quot;You&#039;re going to find it on cable.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:24:05 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NC: Franchise Law Helping … Cable Incumbents</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2163</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6533111.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MultiChannel News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;N.C. Franchise Law Helping … Cable Incumbents&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
AT&amp;amp;T, Other Competitors Have Yet To Apply For Statewide Application&lt;br /&gt;
By Linda Haugsted -- Multichannel News, 2/16/2008 9:29:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; A bill designed to aid competitive video providers in North Carolina has actually deregulated many incumbent operators, while no new competitors have applied to serve the state, according to data compiled by a municipal consultant.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/32">NORTH CAROLINA</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:03:12 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cable TV: King of misleading come-ons</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/2120</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;A href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22399227/&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; MSNBC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cable TV: King of misleading come-ons&lt;br /&gt;
Companies focus on bottom line, not customer satisfaction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Bob Sullivan&lt;br /&gt;
Technology correspondent&lt;br /&gt;
updated 9:38 p.m. ET, Mon., Jan. 28, 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Television, from the start, has always been addictive. And there’s nothing easier than stealing from an addict.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:36:40 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NYC: City to hold hearings for cable watchers</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1998</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/01/04/2008-01-04_city_to_hold_hearings_for_cable_watchers.html&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; NY Daily News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;City to hold hearings for cable watchers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BY FRANK LOMBARDI&lt;br /&gt;
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Friday, January 4th 2008, 4:00 AM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The city is giving cable television viewers a rare opportunity to make some static about the service they get from providers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:16:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The top paid telecom executives of 2006</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1984</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;from: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/534&quot; target=&quot;blank&quot;&gt; Lasar&#039;s Letter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The top paid telecom executives of 2006&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Security and Exchange Commission now has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://216.12.130.224/compensation/action/main/list.action&quot;&gt;handy-dandy new database&lt;/a&gt; that tells you who in the corporate world is making what these days. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are, of course, the firms that voluntarily disclosed this data. LLFCC couldn&amp;#39;t resist downloading the numbers and coming up with this table. Enjoy! &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/11">Qwest</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:56:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mapping a Public Interest Future</title>
 <link>http://saveaccess.org/node/1246</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This week word came that the Grand Rapids Media Center (GRMC) is being forced to reduce operating hours, a casualty of the Michigan State Video Franchise passed last year. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/12">Telcos</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/9">AT&amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/53">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/40">Comcast</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/54">Municipal/Rural Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/31">NEW YORK</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/13">State Franchises</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/39">Time Warner</category>
 <category domain="http://saveaccess.org/taxonomy/term/10">Verizon</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 18:45:22 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
